Is the funding review fair?

Dom Browne

The Government’s plans to bring in a new distribution model for the cash delivered under the local government finance settlement have proved controversial and, given the complexity of the issue, were always likely to be.

When things get too much for rocket scientists or brain surgeons, perhaps they say to each other, ‘come on guys it’s not local government finance’. Or perhaps not. Either way, the situation is a complicated one.

Local government receives a finance settlement from communities department MHCLG, which allocates the cash individually: ‘At present, 15 relative need formulas and several tailored distributions for services previously supported by specific grants are used to determine annual funding allocations for each local authority across England. These formulas involve over 120 indicators of “need”, reflecting factors previously identified as driving the costs of service delivery.’

This is the MHCLG putting the situation in its simplest terms. As a result of the increasing devolution of cash to local authorities, particularly from business rates, which saw a 50% retention rate from 2013-14, the Government has launched a consultation on reforming the system under what has been called the ‘Fair Funding Review’.

The review has already been labelled a ‘stitch-up’ by Labour dominated Northern cities and metropolitan councils, who have accused the Government of using it to push forward plans that would redistribute cash to their heartlands.

The plan would be to distribute cash under a basic ‘funding formula designed primarily on a per capita basis - except for London Boroughs, who will have an adjustment to account for some services being provided by the Greater London Authority - with an Area Cost Adjustment applied. In this the government is moving away from adding in deprivation as a factor in grant funding.

The Government’s response to the consultation in late December argued that Population alone explained 88.1% of all variation in past expenditure at upper tier level and 84.0% of variation in the lower tier Foundation Formula.

Adding deprivation as an additional cost driver increased the proportion of all variation explained by explained by 4% at upper tier and 0.4% at the lower tier, and fixed costs explained an additional 1.4%.

Highways is one of the more technical areas that the Government agreed required a specific approach. Highways maintenance is one area that had traditionally received revenue funding for highways under the purview of the local government department.

Ministers had suggested that road length, traffic flow, and forecast snow days/predicted grit days would be used for this specific distribution formula but then concluded against the inclusion of winter service.

The Government response stated: ‘The Government agrees with the broad consensus behind Road Length and Traffic Flow as the main cost drivers for Highways Maintenance and therefore intends to implement a straightforward formula for this service area that incorporates these two cost drivers. Other cost drivers that were tested did not significantly improve the precision of the formula.’

According to the MHCLG ‘78% of respondents agreed or broadly agreed that these were the correct cost drivers for highways maintenance and public transport, only 2% disagreed’. However, it also conceded that ‘many respondents felt that there were additional factors which should be added to a highways maintenance and public transport formula’.

‘For highways maintenance, there was some consensus around the use of road class (20%), other weather factors such as flooding (14%), highway assets (14%) and all traffic flow (11%). Sources in the sector point out that there was scant modelling or technical information in the consultation document, with little to explain why highways maintenance distribution from MHCLG should be limited to just two factors.

The Rural Services Network, which has scores of rural local authority members, appears to fully support the changes to the highways maintenance formula. Sources suggest they feel the ‘simpler formula means the cost of maintaining a road will be funded at the same rate in both rural or urban locations’.

‘The current formula applies an arbitrary uplift to urban roads without any justification or evidence.’

However it did raise concerns over the decision to drop winter service as a factor in distribution, stating that it can have a ‘significant cost in some rural authorities, particularly those with large upland areas’.

‘We should urge the MHCLG to engage with these authorities to understand the additional costs associated with winter services. If these cost can be shown to be material, MHCLG should consider reintroducing a suitable indicator.’

In terms of local bus transport, the Government has suggested that this may not even be given a specific factor set.

‘The Government is minded to include Concessionary Travel within the upper tier Foundation Formula on the basis that this would introduce further simplicity and transparency into the relative needs assessment. The Government will, however, carry out further analysis on potential alternative approaches in order to determine whether this approach adequately reflects local authorities’ relative needs.’

It added: ‘Given the overall scale and distribution of expenditure for this service area, the Government does not believe that it is proportionate to introduce a specific funding formula for this service area. However, including this in the upper tier Foundation Formula so that it is broadly distributed on a ‘per capita’ basis, with a new ‘Area Cost Adjustment’, means that the funding for this service area will be distributed according to the characteristics of local authority areas and not directly linked to historical decisions about funding levels.’

John Lamb, president of the Local Government Technical Advisers Group, suggested this issue ‘could be helpfully influenced by engagement with bus operators’.

He pointed out: ‘There is a major focus here on concessionary bus cost but this is only part of the bus ‘offer’ albeit vital to local communities. Moreover local councils have removed significant funding for socially necessary bus services and these have had large components of concessionary fare users. The sector continues to call for a full and substantive consideration on concessionary fares scheme and sees a potential lost opportunity.’

On flood resilience and coastal erosion, the Government conceded that this areas could be minimal overall in terms of spending but have huge costs to targeted areas. MHCLG officials said that more analysis was needed.

The ministry stated: ‘Spending patterns suggest separate flood defence and coastal protection relative needs formulas could be introduced for lower tier authorities. After initial analysis, the Government has identified the cost drivers it believes are the most significant cost drivers for flood defence and for coastal protection in its accompanying consultation. The Government will use local authority-level expenditure-based regression as the basis for further analytical work to determine whether these are the most appropriate cost drivers, before taking a view on the best approach.

‘However, the Government is minded to incorporate upper tier flood defence and coastal protection within the upper tier Foundation Formula, on the basis of overall scale of expenditure and the distribution of relative needs.’

The Local Government Association is currently finalising its response to the Government’s plans.

A spokesperson for the MHCLG said: ‘We have launched a consultation seeking views on what factors to include in a new funding formula. This is a complex piece of work and we will take the time to get it right. We have been clear that this is a review of the relative needs and resources of local authorities.’

Highways jobs

Surface Water Engineer

Essex County Council
£30001.0 - £35350 per annum
At Essex County Council, we're passionate about helping deliver economic growth, the best starts in life and the chance to age well for people in the England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Highways Operations Manager

Swindon Borough Council
Salary up to £41,494 p.a.
In this key role, you will plan, organise, co-ordinate and control the workforce Swindon, Wiltshire
Recruiter: Swindon Borough Council

Senior Engineer (Highways Maintenance Design)

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£22,462 - £29,636
Are you looking for an opportunity to work as a Senior Engineer, whilst still being able to develop your career and have a good work-life balance? Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Highways Projects Engineer

Cambridgeshire County Council
£33,153 - £35,755
Looking for strong team players interested in working with a variety of professional and community partners across Cambridgeshire and... Cambridgeshire
Recruiter: Cambridgeshire County Council

Senior Heating Engineer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Up to £48,692 per annum
Looking for a Senior Heating Engineer who will work as part of one of the small professional teams. London (Greater)
Recruiter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Senior Traffic Management and Parking Engineer

North Yorkshire County Council
£34,788 to £42,683
Are your skills and experiences suited to a traffic and parking engineer position? Is project work something you enjoy doing? Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Lead Practitioner (Infrastructure)

Newark & Sherwood District Council
£33,799 to £35,934 per annum
Newark and Sherwood is looking to recruit to its newly created post of Lead Practitioner for Infrastructure. Newark, Nottinghamshire
Recruiter: Newark & Sherwood District Council

Senior Parking Manager

Brent Council
£55,638 - £58,779 p.a. inc.
As Senior Parking Manager, you will be responsible for the effective management of the Council’s Parking Services contract Brentford (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Highways Inspector

Hackney London Borough Council
£28,752 - £32,577
We are seeking an experienced Highways Inspector to join the Highways Team. Hackney, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Hackney London Borough Council

School Crossing Patrol

Brent Council
£21,591 - £22,377 p.a. inc. pro rata. (£11.50 per hour)
A school crossing patrol officer is responsible for assisting children to cross the road safely on their way to and from school. Brent, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Assistant Director - Environment

Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council
£82k per annum
Our Assistant Director – Environment will ensure clean, safe and attractive communities. Redcar, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council

Traffic Engineering Team Leader

Telford & Wrekin Council
£39,782 - £42,683
This is an exciting opportunity to join Telford & Wrekin Council’s Network Management Team Telford, Shropshire
Recruiter: Telford & Wrekin Council

Street Lighting Client Officer

Enfield London Borough Council
£37,842 – £40,728
As a Street Lighting Client Officer, you will assist the Streetlighting Client Manager in managing the Council’s Street lighting Service Provider Enfield (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Enfield London Borough Council

Pest Control Officer

Brent Council
£26,745 - £28,725 p.a. inc.
Brent Council's Pest Control and Hygiene service continues to see a growing demand in its pest control services. Brentford (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

PCN Appeals Officer

Brent Council
£26,745 - £30,711 p.a. inc.
We are looking for an experienced parking professional to join the Notice Processing Team Brentford (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Citizen & Consumer Protection Team Manager - Trading Standards

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Band H, SCP 38-43 (£40,760 - £45,591 per annum) (£21.13 - £23.63 per hour)
We have an exciting opportunity to recruit to the position of Citizen & Consumer Protection Team Manager Sandwell, West Midlands
Recruiter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Key Route Network Manager

Liverpool City Region
£63,753 - £71,747
An exciting new opportunity has arisen within the Integrated Transport Directorate of the LCR Combined Authority Liverpool, Merseyside
Recruiter: Liverpool City Region

Assistant Director

Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council
£92,826 - £111,231
This is an ideal opportunity for an expert waste management professional to make a real impact and to lead the service to outstanding. Fulham, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council

Partnership Director (Fixed Term for 2 years)

£79,165 - £83,020
An exciting opportunity has arisen for the post of Partnership Director for the Tayside & Central Scotland Transport Partnership (Tactran). Perth, Perth and Kinross
Recruiter: Tactran

Service Director Planning, Transportation and Highways

Wakefield Council
To lead on behalf of the Council on all planning, transportation and highways matters Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Wakefield Council

Highways on Fridays

Register now!

Latest Issue

latest magazine issue

Valuing our roads: What is a network worth?

Also inside:

Traffex review 

Diary of a flood.

Beautiful roads

Live Labs exclusive briefing 

View the latest issue

Latest Video