Is the funding review fair?

23/01/2019
Dom Browne

The Government’s plans to bring in a new distribution model for the cash delivered under the local government finance settlement have proved controversial and, given the complexity of the issue, were always likely to be.

When things get too much for rocket scientists or brain surgeons, perhaps they say to each other, ‘come on guys it’s not local government finance’. Or perhaps not. Either way, the situation is a complicated one.

Local government receives a finance settlement from communities department MHCLG, which allocates the cash individually: ‘At present, 15 relative need formulas and several tailored distributions for services previously supported by specific grants are used to determine annual funding allocations for each local authority across England. These formulas involve over 120 indicators of “need”, reflecting factors previously identified as driving the costs of service delivery.’

This is the MHCLG putting the situation in its simplest terms. As a result of the increasing devolution of cash to local authorities, particularly from business rates, which saw a 50% retention rate from 2013-14, the Government has launched a consultation on reforming the system under what has been called the ‘Fair Funding Review’.

The review has already been labelled a ‘stitch-up’ by Labour dominated Northern cities and metropolitan councils, who have accused the Government of using it to push forward plans that would redistribute cash to their heartlands.

The plan would be to distribute cash under a basic ‘funding formula designed primarily on a per capita basis - except for London Boroughs, who will have an adjustment to account for some services being provided by the Greater London Authority - with an Area Cost Adjustment applied. In this the government is moving away from adding in deprivation as a factor in grant funding.

The Government’s response to the consultation in late December argued that Population alone explained 88.1% of all variation in past expenditure at upper tier level and 84.0% of variation in the lower tier Foundation Formula.

Adding deprivation as an additional cost driver increased the proportion of all variation explained by explained by 4% at upper tier and 0.4% at the lower tier, and fixed costs explained an additional 1.4%.

Highways is one of the more technical areas that the Government agreed required a specific approach. Highways maintenance is one area that had traditionally received revenue funding for highways under the purview of the local government department.

Ministers had suggested that road length, traffic flow, and forecast snow days/predicted grit days would be used for this specific distribution formula but then concluded against the inclusion of winter service.

The Government response stated: ‘The Government agrees with the broad consensus behind Road Length and Traffic Flow as the main cost drivers for Highways Maintenance and therefore intends to implement a straightforward formula for this service area that incorporates these two cost drivers. Other cost drivers that were tested did not significantly improve the precision of the formula.’

According to the MHCLG ‘78% of respondents agreed or broadly agreed that these were the correct cost drivers for highways maintenance and public transport, only 2% disagreed’. However, it also conceded that ‘many respondents felt that there were additional factors which should be added to a highways maintenance and public transport formula’.

‘For highways maintenance, there was some consensus around the use of road class (20%), other weather factors such as flooding (14%), highway assets (14%) and all traffic flow (11%). Sources in the sector point out that there was scant modelling or technical information in the consultation document, with little to explain why highways maintenance distribution from MHCLG should be limited to just two factors.

The Rural Services Network, which has scores of rural local authority members, appears to fully support the changes to the highways maintenance formula. Sources suggest they feel the ‘simpler formula means the cost of maintaining a road will be funded at the same rate in both rural or urban locations’.

‘The current formula applies an arbitrary uplift to urban roads without any justification or evidence.’

However it did raise concerns over the decision to drop winter service as a factor in distribution, stating that it can have a ‘significant cost in some rural authorities, particularly those with large upland areas’.

‘We should urge the MHCLG to engage with these authorities to understand the additional costs associated with winter services. If these cost can be shown to be material, MHCLG should consider reintroducing a suitable indicator.’

In terms of local bus transport, the Government has suggested that this may not even be given a specific factor set.

‘The Government is minded to include Concessionary Travel within the upper tier Foundation Formula on the basis that this would introduce further simplicity and transparency into the relative needs assessment. The Government will, however, carry out further analysis on potential alternative approaches in order to determine whether this approach adequately reflects local authorities’ relative needs.’

It added: ‘Given the overall scale and distribution of expenditure for this service area, the Government does not believe that it is proportionate to introduce a specific funding formula for this service area. However, including this in the upper tier Foundation Formula so that it is broadly distributed on a ‘per capita’ basis, with a new ‘Area Cost Adjustment’, means that the funding for this service area will be distributed according to the characteristics of local authority areas and not directly linked to historical decisions about funding levels.’

John Lamb, president of the Local Government Technical Advisers Group, suggested this issue ‘could be helpfully influenced by engagement with bus operators’.

He pointed out: ‘There is a major focus here on concessionary bus cost but this is only part of the bus ‘offer’ albeit vital to local communities. Moreover local councils have removed significant funding for socially necessary bus services and these have had large components of concessionary fare users. The sector continues to call for a full and substantive consideration on concessionary fares scheme and sees a potential lost opportunity.’

On flood resilience and coastal erosion, the Government conceded that this areas could be minimal overall in terms of spending but have huge costs to targeted areas. MHCLG officials said that more analysis was needed.

The ministry stated: ‘Spending patterns suggest separate flood defence and coastal protection relative needs formulas could be introduced for lower tier authorities. After initial analysis, the Government has identified the cost drivers it believes are the most significant cost drivers for flood defence and for coastal protection in its accompanying consultation. The Government will use local authority-level expenditure-based regression as the basis for further analytical work to determine whether these are the most appropriate cost drivers, before taking a view on the best approach.

‘However, the Government is minded to incorporate upper tier flood defence and coastal protection within the upper tier Foundation Formula, on the basis of overall scale of expenditure and the distribution of relative needs.’

The Local Government Association is currently finalising its response to the Government’s plans.

A spokesperson for the MHCLG said: ‘We have launched a consultation seeking views on what factors to include in a new funding formula. This is a complex piece of work and we will take the time to get it right. We have been clear that this is a review of the relative needs and resources of local authorities.’

Highways jobs

Senior Clerk of Works

Bedford Borough Council
£27,905 - £30,507 + market rate supplement £2,630 per annum
Bedford is growing at a fast pace and we are investing heavily in our highways infrastructure. Bedford, Bedfordshire
Recuriter: Bedford Borough Council

Service Manager – Network Management

Somerset County Council
£46,122 per annum
A number of exciting permanent opportunities have arisen to drive forward further improvements to our traffic related services. Somerset
Recuriter: Somerset County Council

Principal Traffic Control Engineer

Somerset County Council
£33,799 to £37,849 per annum
A number of exciting permanent opportunities have arisen to drive forward further improvements to our traffic related services. Somerset
Recuriter: Somerset County Council

Assistant Engineer

Bedford Borough Council
£31,371 - £32,878 per annum
Bedford is growing at a fast pace and we are investing heavily in our highways infrastructure. Bedford, Bedfordshire
Recuriter: Bedford Borough Council

Senior Technician

Bedford Borough Council
£27,905 - £30,507 per annum
Bedford is growing at a fast pace and we are investing heavily in our highways infrastructure. Bedford, Bedfordshire
Recuriter: Bedford Borough Council

Engineering Technician

Bedford Borough Council
£24,313 - £26,999 per annum
Bedford is growing at a fast pace and we are investing heavily in our highways infrastructure. Bedford, Bedfordshire
Recuriter: Bedford Borough Council

Engineer – Multiple disciplines

Bedford Borough Council
£33,799 - £36,876 per annum
Bedford is growing at a fast pace and we are investing heavily in our highways infrastructure.  Bedford, Bedfordshire
Recuriter: Bedford Borough Council

Trainee Engineering Technician

Bedford Borough Council
£21,589 - £23,836 per annum
Bedford is growing at a fast pace and we are investing heavily in our highways infrastructure. Bedford, Bedfordshire
Recuriter: Bedford Borough Council

Senior Asset Engineer

Isle of Man Government
£47,064 - £54,805
The Isle of Man is a special place to live and work! Isle of Man (GB) (IM)
Recuriter: Isle of Man Government

Commercial Services Officer - Funerals

Brent Council
£33,291 - £35,724 p.a. inc. plus Standby Allowance
The post will be involved in all aspects of the funeral service Brent, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Brent Council

Transportation Planning Officer x2

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Band F, SCP 26-31 (£29,636 – £33,799 per annum) (£15.36 - £17.52 per hour)
The post holders will be part of a team developing transport policy encompassing all modes of travel Sandwell, West Midlands
Recuriter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Highway Asset Engineer

Lambeth Council
£38,403 pa rising in annual increments to £41,466 pa incl LW
Lambeth is a vibrant place with a diverse population and an exciting cultural scene. Lambeth, London (Greater)
Recuriter: Lambeth Council

Senior Traffic Engineer

East Riding of Yorkshire Council
£32.029 - £34.788 career grade
We need an enthusiastic and experienced traffic engineer to manage our Traffic Team. East Riding of Yorkshire
Recuriter: East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Senior Community Infrastructure Levy Administration Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£32,643 - £44,373
The successful candidate will play a key role in ensuring Richmond and Wandsworth Councils mitigate the... London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Principal Information and Monitoring Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£40,183-£47,274 (Grade PO5)
Opportunity has arisen within the Spatial and Transport Planning service for a team leader with demonstrable practical experience of... London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Senior Community Infrastructure Levy Administration Officer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£32,643-£44,373 (Linked Grade PO2- PO4)
There has never been a more challenging – or rewarding – time to work for Richmond and Wandsworth.  London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Senior Engineer – Highways Development Service (HDS)

North Yorkshire County Council
£38,813 - £42,683 pa
We are looking for someone to join the Development Management Team in a new post. Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recuriter: North Yorkshire County Council

Senior Development Management Engineer – Section 38

Warwickshire County Council
£37,849 - £39,782
Due to the nature of the role the ability to travel effectively throughout Warwickshire is essential. Warwick, Warwickshire
Recuriter: Warwickshire County Council

Partnerships & Activities Manager

London Borough of Bexley
£31,353 - £36,876
Currently seeking an experienced manager to work in the Parks and Open Spaces Team of Bexley Council’s Communities Department. Bexley (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recuriter: London Borough of Bexley

Chartered Environmental Health Traineeships– 3 Jobs

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
National Minimum Wage (Age appropriate) plus enhancements for night time working
This traineeship opportunity is for graduates to undertake the new Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH)... Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recuriter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Highways on Fridays

Latest Issue

latest magazine issue

Zero carbon roads?

Modelling the future

A breath of fresh air

View the latest issue

Latest Video