Funding conundrum for Welsh transport

Rhodri Clark

Public borrowing is the usual way of financing new roads in Wales but, with several large schemes waiting in the wings, alternative funding methods are now being considered.

Wales has big ambitions to improve its transport system – ambitions that are greater than the funding available. As the Welsh Government prepares for the construction of the M4 Relief Road at Newport, many Welsh Assembly Members and others are concerned that at an estimated cost of £1.32bn – excluding VAT and inflation – this single scheme will preclude much-needed transport investments elsewhere in the devolved nation.

However, the Welsh Government is exploring other funding options including a new form of Public Private Partnership (PPP) [see Highways March 2018 page 6]. It is not ruling out paying for new infrastructure through user tolls – advocated by its former advisor, Professor Gerry Holtham.

There is probably nobody in Wales who believes the current situation on the M4 around Newport is acceptable. The road varies between three and two lanes. Widening is not feasible, not least because the route burrows beneath housing at the twin-bore Brynglas Tunnels. Peak congestion is a problem, and the frequent accidents cause major delays not only on the M4 but also on local roads to which traffic quickly diverts.

While there is consensus that the problem should be addressed urgently, opinions vary over the best response even within the ruling Labour Party. Some argue that a cheaper alternative route, largely using upgraded existing roads, would provide sufficient new capacity and reliability, but the Government argues that this route would run close to residential areas, where air and noise pollution would increase. Other opponents of the Government’s favoured scheme believe the solution lies not in road building but in reducing demand for travel on the M4 by investing heavily in improved public transport and encouraging more rail freight.

Critics also highlight increases in the preferred scheme’s cost. In December, the Government unveiled a package of additional mitigation measures to prevent the new road impairing the operation of Newport docks (pictured). Those measures are costed at £137m – more than the cost of some proposed bypass schemes. That sort of money could transform active travel rates in Wales, with consequent benefits for public health, if invested in facilities where anyone can feel safe cycling and walking.

Bus managers would argue that even a fraction of the £137m would do wonders for their industry, which suffered a 25% cut in Welsh Government grant in 2013 to £25m per year. Recent statistics show a 36% reduction in subsidised bus service kilometres in Wales from 2012-13 to 2016-17, reflecting pressure on local authority budgets. A £137m windfall would also of course allow councils to renew many highway surfaces and structures.

Also in the Government’s pipeline are several other trunk road improvements, notably a £200m scheme to connect the A55 to the under-utilised Flintshire Bridge. This would provide an alternative dual carriageway between Wales and England, relieving existing roads and sub-standard junctions.

Back in 2008, the UK and Welsh governments appointed Prof Holtham to lead a commission on Wales’ funding. From 2012 to 2014 he was the Welsh Government’s advisor on infrastructure investment.

Asked for his views on funding the M4 Relief Road and other transport schemes, he told Highways that he has no opinion on the optimal plan for the M4 scheme, but added: ‘I do think, however, that any such road should certainly be tolled.’

He explained: ‘It provides an alternative to an existing route, so no-one is obliged to pay the toll if they prefer to sit in a jam. There is scope for “smart” tolling whereby the price can reflect traffic conditions.

‘Why should the taxpayer finance the construction when road users, who benefit, can do so? The reduction or abolition of tolls on the Severn bridges creates room for such a toll. The Welsh Government is short of money and looking at possible new taxes. Tolling an M4 relief road is a better option than many other possibilities.’

When tolling was briefly mooted a decade ago, one of the drawbacks was that M4 users were paying high tolls to use the Severn Crossings, under the terms of the private concession that built the second crossing in the 1990s. The concession ended in January, and Highways England immediately reduced the tolls by removing VAT. The UK Government has pledged to abolish the tolls by the end of the year.

The Welsh Government is also progressing development of a third crossing of the Menai Strait, between Anglesey and the mainland. The forecast cost has increased from £130m to £200m, but in 2016 the Welsh Government revealed that it was pursuing the possibility of a joint scheme with the National Grid, which will require new power cables across the Strait if the proposed Wylfa Newydd nuclear power station is built on Anglesey. Transport secretary Ken Skates said a shared crossing ‘would massively reduce taxpayers’ contribution.

Prof Holtham, professor of regional economy at Cardiff Metropolitan University, supports this attempt to reduce the cost to the taxpayer. He said: ‘If they build a third Menai crossing, it should certainly be a joint venture not only with National Grid but [also] the company building Wylfa, who also stand to benefit.

‘Moreover, they should close the other crossing to commercial traffic above a certain size, obliging them to use the third crossing. It should then be tolled to finance the Welsh Government’s costs. Local users will, once again, have the option of using the old crossing. At present, lorries to and from the Irish Republic pay nothing for the use of Welsh roads and the wear and tear they impose. Here is a way to get them to do so.’

Although such a proposal might induce complaints from across the Irish Sea, Welsh ministers could point to the Republic of Ireland’s own road-user tolls – including several that cars and lorries have to pay near Dublin after leaving the Holyhead ferry.

Prof Holtham added: ‘The Welsh Government seem prejudiced against the use of road tolls but they should not be. Tolls provide a way to finance infrastructure investment more equitably, a way to discriminate in favour of public transport and a way to tax non-resident road-users who otherwise inflict costs that they don’t help to defray.’

Responding to Prof Holtham’s comments, a government spokeswoman said: ‘The ideas put forward by Prof Holtham are interesting. We will consider all proposals that could enhance the competitiveness of the Welsh economy and the infrastructure on which we depend.’

The Welsh Government also wishes to finish dualling the A465 across the Heads of the Valleys. Dualling the last remaining single-carriageway section is estimated at £428m, excluding VAT and inflation. The Government has developed a form of PPP called the Mutual Investment Model (MIM) to finance this, and some non-transport schemes, ‘due to a scarcity of capital funding’.

Private partners will take the risk on construction and the Government will pay a shadow toll. Ministers say the MIM is different from previous PPPs, since the Government will take up to 20% of the equity in the company set up to dual the road, giving taxpayers a share of the profits. A government-appointed ‘public interest director’ will sit on the company’s board to embed ‘transparency about costs, efficiency and performance, with requirements for regular review’.

Last year Plaid Cymru suggested that bonds might be a better way of borrowing the money. Finance secretary Mark Drakeford said bonds had been considered but added: ‘To date, I’ve not seen any convincing evidence that would suggest to me that bond financing would be a more effective way of securing the necessary investment to complete the dualling of the Heads of the Valleys road.’

Latest Issue

latest magazine issue


  • COP26: The sector reacts
  • Road pricing: Putting the theory into practice
View the latest issue

Highways jobs

Senior Engineer- Highways

£23,080- £30,451
Our Highways Service is growing to reflect the increase in investment. Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Environmental Data Officer

In this role you will collect, maintain and manage high quality energy and environmental data, and providing... Camden, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Camden London Borough Council

Senior Engineer - Highways Asset Maintenance

£39,854 to £43,741 (Pay Award Pending)
There’s never been a more exciting time to join Doncaster Council. Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recruiter: Doncaster Council

Director of Environmental & Community Services

Up to £90,096 per annum
We seek an energetic and committed Director who has the right motivations and values; someone who is... Long Eaton, Nottingham
Recruiter: Erewash Borough Council

Transport Infrastructure Commissioning Officer

£30,451 to £34,728 per annum
We have a great opportunity in Somerset to join our Highways and Transport Service. Taunton, Somerset
Recruiter: Somerset County Council

Team Manager Band 3 – Environment Strategy & Change

£46,845 - £48,849 per annum
This is the perfect time to join St Helens and become part of our exhilarating journey and help build our legacy for the future. St Helens, Merseyside
Recruiter: St. Helens Metropolitan Borough Council

Noise and Nuisance Officer

£32,301 - £35,949 per annum
To be successful in the Noise and Nuisance Team you will need a genuine commitment to... Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recruiter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Team Manager Band 3 - Fleet, Depot & Security

£46,845 - £48,849 per annum
This is the perfect time to join St Helens and become part of our exhilarating journey and help build our legacy for the future. St Helens, Merseyside
Recruiter: St. Helens Metropolitan Borough Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Asset Manager

£42,821 - £46,845 per annum
The Highway Asset Manager is responsible for the strategic management of all the council’s highway assets... Blackburn, Lancashire
Recruiter: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Digital Evidence Officer

£25.137 - £26.520
The Digital Evidence (CCTV) Team are responsible for improving community safety outcomes throughout the Royal Borough of Greenwich by... Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Guaranteed Relief Cleaners North and South Kirklees Area

£9.25 per hour
Some of the key features and benefits of being part of the Kirklees Cleaning Service include... Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Group Engineer - Safety Design

£40,876 - £45,859
We are looking for an experienced engineer to join our Highways Safety Design team. Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Group Engineer - Highways Network Management

£40,876 - £45,859
Are you experienced engineer looking for an opportunity to improve the lives of the local people of our towns and village centres? Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Energy and Sustainability Officer

£37.722 - £40.869
The role will be key to successful progress of the Carbon Neutral Plan and setting the borough on the path to reaching the net zero target.  Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Transport Development Team Leader

£53,018 - £59,964 per annum + Staff Benefits
We're looking for an experienced and innovative engineer. Woking, Surrey
Recruiter: Surrey County Council

Highways Presents


Highways on Fridays

Register now!

Latest Video