HARPing on about driverless vehicles

18/12/2019 | CHRIS AMES

The Law Commissions of England and Wales, and of Scotland, have said Britain is one step closer to self-driving passenger vehicles as they published a consultation paper on the issue. Chris Ames gets aboard the debate.

The consultation is part of a three-year project in which the two law commissions are reviewing driving legislation to prepare for the introduction of self-driving vehicles on UK roads. Whereas an earlier consultation paper considered safety assurance together with civil and criminal liability, the new paper focuses on how automated trips might be supplied to the public in vehicles that can travel empty or only with passengers and no driver or user-in-charge.

The commissions refer to these as Highly Automated Road Passenger Services (HARPS), explaining: ‘We have coined the term HARPS to encapsulate the idea of a new service.’

Caroline S Drummond, commissioner at the Scottish Law Commission, says: ‘Our aim is to ensure these new self-driving cars are safe and can help to meet the objectives set by local and central Government.’

Rather than the five common levels of driving automation, the commissions propose a threefold classification: assisted driving, where the user remains in charge throughout; high automation with a user in charge; and high automation without a user in charge (albeit possibly with remote supervision) and able to travel empty. HARPS fall within the highest level.

Dr Wolfgang Schuster, technical director of transportation UK and Europe at Atkins, agrees. He tells Highways: ‘We know that there is a challenge here around when you don’t know what your responsibility is then of course that has safety complications. ‘So simplifying that model is a good way forward because it will make it very clear that you are in one of three categories which has very well defined responsibilities associated with it.’

The paper points out that where passengers have no legal responsibility for the vehicle, the paradigm changes. It argues that HARPS vehicles need to not just be safe by design, but safe by operation, with the latter being its main focus.

Designing a new system

It then poses the question: ‘What should a regulatory system for HARPS be designed to achieve?’ before explaining how, to identify the opportunities and risks posed by HARPS, ‘we set out two competing visions’.

It states: ‘The positive vision shows how HARPS could help achieve these objectives. The negative vision looks at the risk they could make things worse.’

These two visions are a recurring theme in discussions of self-driving vehicles and of Mobility as a Service (MaaS), the door-to-door transportation concept in which self-driving vehicles are predicted to play a significant role.

This brings the commissions to an in-depth discussion of the policy issues that precede the legal ones. On the plus side, the paper argues that self-driving vehicles carrying passengers have the potential to create significant societal benefits by reducing the necessity to own a car.

It points out that once people own (and have usually paid for) a car, they tend to use it, even when alternatives are available, partly because the marginal costs are relatively small. And although taxis are one alternative, ‘they can be costly, with 40% to 50% of operating costs spent on drivers’.

The benefits of HARPS could include:

  1. Reduced congestion: HARPS will reduce congestion if rides are shared or they encourage people to use mass transit;
  2. Reduced car parking: with HARPS vehicles able to be used more intensively, space currently ceded to parking could be used in other ways including more cycling lanes and healthier streets;
  3. Affordable and flexible bus services: employment costs of drivers currently comprise around 40% of running costs of buses. With reduced costs, public subsidies could be used to provide more services and it would become more economic to run smaller bus services at more frequent intervals;
  4. Increased accessibility for older people and disabled people: HARPS could provide accessible services that are more affordable than current alternatives;
  5. Improved safety: through sensors, data sharing, safer driving behaviour and faster-than-human reaction times;
  6. Environmental benefits: automated vehicles would be able to drive in more efficient and environmentally friendly ways, while their safer driving style may also make people feel more comfortable to walk and cycle;
  7. Reclaimed time: the average driver spends an estimated 236 hours behind the wheel each year.

Dr Shuster tells Highways he believes the biggest positive impact could be on older people and others with mobility difficulties, but also cites the city planning benefits of a reduced need for parking.

For the commissions, the ‘potential challenges that may arise from the introduction of these vehicles if effective regulation is not in place’ include:

  1. Safety concerns: while automated vehicles have the potential to be safer than human drivers, public trust could be undermined by even a few high-profile collisions;
  2. Inhibiting traffic flow: HARPS vehicles might freeze when confronted with unexpected weather conditions or unknown obstacles (including, possibly, leaves or plastic bags);
  3. Reduced accessibility: many older or disabled persons who currently rely on taxis or private hire vehicles also rely on their drivers to assist them by, for example, helping them into the vehicle or accompanying them to and from their door;
  4. Congestion: large numbers of new vehicles will be placed onto urban roads before private car use has reduced, worsening congestion;
  5. Rural areas: such areas could benefit enormously from HARPS, but narrow and often unmarked rural roads present many challenges;
  6. Employment: there are concerns that HARPS could have a negative impact on jobs. The paper states that the issue is outside of the commissions’ terms of reference.

The solutions

The paper suggests what might be done to address most of these challenges and asks a series of questions to examine the types of changes that may be required to regulate HARPS.

On the issue of controlling congestion, traffic regulation orders are put forward as a possible approach, before moving on to the potentially controversial suggestion that parking charges for HARPS could be reduced and the equally thorny issue of road pricing, perhaps backed by a specific statutory scheme.

Dr Shuster says: ‘First of all, we need to look very carefully at the commercial models, because there is a tight interlink between the operational model and the commercial models.

‘The ideal scenario would be that at any point in time, if there is enough demand, these vehicles will serve a purpose; they won’t just be cruising for the sake of cruising, but if this vehicle drives me from A to B and hopefully I’m going to share that journey with someone else, when I arrive there it will have already received its next demand to bring someone from C to D.’

Another question raised by the paper is how HARPS should be integrated with public transport. It also asks whether HARPS should be subject to a new, single, national system of operator licensing. The paper suggests that it should, with a HARPS operator defined as ‘any business which carries passengers for hire or reward using highly automated vehicles on a road without the services of a human driver or user-in-charge’.

It then asks what obligations should fall on HARPS operators, for example relating to maintenance, remote supervision and the reporting of accidents.

In the paper this category is distinguished from private ownership, including leasing, asking who these obligations should fall on when a passenger-only vehicle is privately owned, but also how consumers can be protected from the unexpectedly high ongoing costs of such a complex vehicle.

Overall, Dr Shuster feels the upsides of HARPS far outweigh the potential downsides, most of which he says ‘can be eliminated through putting in place appropriate commercial models, regulatory infrastructure and so on’.

Highways InProfile

latest magazine issue
Highways jobs

Senior Civil Engineer - Major Projects x 4

£45,894.00 - £54,952.00
We are looking for experienced engineers to help us progress a number of key projects and programmes Glasgow, Glasgow City
Recruiter: Transport Scotland

Technician - Maintenance

£31001.0000 - £36471.0000 per annum
Essex Highways is responsible for managing and maintaining one of the largest highway networks in the country
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Highways Contract Engineer

£46,731 - £49,764
The team helps provide a safe road network that operates efficiently and effectively.  Northamptonshire
Recruiter: North Northamptonshire Council

Principal Transport Planner

£46,731 - £49,764 (pro-rata)
We are looking for an experienced professional to join us on a six-month temporary contact as a Principal Transport Planner. Kettering, Northamptonshire
Recruiter: North Northamptonshire Council

Highways Maintenance Operative

£Competitive
We have a fantastic opportunity for a Permanent Highways Maintenance Operative Broughton, Brigg
Recruiter: Amey

Head of Highways Contracts & Network

£81,803 progressing to £90,664 per annum
The team includes approximately 60 directly employed HCC people Hertfordshire
Recruiter: Hertfordshire County Council

Principal Construction Manager

£Competitive
We are excited to offer a fantastic opportunity for a Permanent Principal Construction Manager Yorkshire and the Humber
Recruiter: Amey

Quality Technician

£Competitive
We are excited to offer a fantastic opportunity for a Permanent Quality Technician Yorkshire and the Humber
Recruiter: Amey

Senior Highway Engineer (Development Management)

£42679.0000 - £50211.0000 per annum
Senior Highway Engineer (Development Management)Permanent, Full Time£43,960 to £51,718 per annum*Location
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Project Manager (Major Projects)

£44,711 - £47,754
Are you an experienced project professional or engineer with looking to take the next step in your career? Halifax, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Senior Civil Engineer - Roads

£45,894 - £54,952
Are you an experienced engineer looking to support the Scottish Government’s national objectives. Scotland
Recruiter: Transport Scotland

Project Team Manager

£55,147 to £60,676 per annum
We are pleased to be able to offer an opportunity for a role as Design Team Manager Norwich, Norfolk
Recruiter: Norfolk County Council

Clerk of Works

GRADE 08 (£37,938 - £41,511)
Warrington is one of the most successful towns in the country Warrington, Cheshire
Recruiter: Warrington Borough Council

Assistant Projects Engineer

GRADE 06 (£29,093 - £32,654),GRADE 07 (£33,366 - £37,035), GRADE 08 (£37,938 - £41,511)
Warrington is one of the most successful towns in the country Warrington, Cheshire
Recruiter: Warrington Borough Council

Principal Engineer - Traffic Management

£45,718 - £48,710 per annum
At Bath & North East Somerset Council we have one overriding purpose – to improve people’s lives. Bath, Somerset
Recruiter: Bath & North East Somerset Council

Vehicle Technician - Improver

£28,624 - £30,060
Transport Services is responsible for all aspects of transport and related services Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Programme Delivery Office Administrator

Grade 9 £31,344 - £33,253 per annum
At Derbyshire, we have been on a journey to transform the way we deliver highway services to make them fit for the future Derbyshire
Recruiter: Derbyshire County Council

Support Officer - Highways Asset Management Systems

£31,586 - £34,314
We are a forward-thinking organisation dedicated to maintaining and improving our highway infrastructure. Lincolnshire
Recruiter: Lincolnshire County Council

Principal Transport Planner (Strategy)

£46,731-£49,764
We are looking for an experienced professional to join North Northamptonshire Council as a Principal Transport Planner (Strategy). Sheerness House, 41 Meadow Road, Kettering moving to Haylock House, Kettering Parkway, Kettering NN15 6EY, United Kingdom
Recruiter: North Northamptonshire Council

Electrical Engineer

Grade 9 £34,314 to £37,938 - Grade 10 £37,035 to £40,476 - Grade 11 £39,513 to £43,693 - Grade 12 £42,708 to £46,731 p.a.
The Construction Consultancy Services (CCS) team provide client-side construction consultancy services across a range of professional disciplines to d Durham
Recruiter: Durham County Council
SUBSCRIBE NOW

Latest Video

Subscribe to Highways today to ensure you keep your finger on the pulse of everything happening in the UK road network throughout the year.

SUBSCRIBE NOW