The Government has been taken to task by its own infrastructure advisers over delays to the third Road Investment Strategy for the strategic road network (SRN).
The National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) made the criticism in its Infrastructure Progress Review 2024, following last October’s second National Infrastructure Assessment, which set out a costed package of recommendations.
The third RIS should have been published by the end of last year it said and should be published 'as soon as possible'.
It adds: ‘Funding for this strategy should also match the original funding allocation of around £27 billion for the second Road Investment Strategy.’
On wider public spending plans, the NIC said that beyond the current Parliament, the UK will be unable to afford the infrastructure it needs
The progress review notes that the Government’s stated plan beyond 2024-25 would freeze overall capital spending in cash terms and says that if this was applied to infrastructure spending, ‘it would not be consistent with the funding profile the Commission has set out to deliver the recommendations in the second Assessment’.
In the document’s foreword, NIC chair Sir John Armitt (pictured) wrote: ‘A window remains to ensure that practical delivery plans are in place, backed up by the necessary public and private funding, to help achieve economic and environmental goals that will improve life for British households.
‘But the window is closing, at least if we don’t want to delay those benefits and compound the disruption of recent years.’
The review adds that the Government risks breaking its pledge to spend £100bn on infrastructure between 2022 and 2025.
It paints a ‘mixed picture of progress towards key infrastructure goals’, noting that while UK infrastructure performs well in some areas, ‘significant deficiencies’ in others are holding back productivity and impacting quality of life.
‘These include under investment in transport systems in regional English cities, the failure to build major water resource reservoirs in England in the last 30 years, too many properties being at risk of flooding, and recycling rates which have stalled for a decade.’
On funding within regions, it says that if funding levels recently announced for five-year City Region Sustainable Transport Settlements are maintained for the next 20 years, that would broadly be in line with the recommended levels in the second Assessment.
Similarly, recent increases in local road maintenance funding are also in line with the Assessment, the review notes. However, it argues that Transport for London and other authorities responsible for transport beyond mayoral combined authorities need five-year funding settlements.
The document also notes that the £4.7bn Local Transport Fund only covers authorities in the Midlands and North.
The document criticises the decision to scrap the second leg of HS 2 without a concrete plan for improving connectivity and capacity in the North and Midlands, which it says ‘creates uncertainty which will inhibit economic growth in the affected regions’.
The review suggests that recently updated National Policy Statements, including for national networks, should ensure faster decision making on major projects, but adds that opportunities remain to go further by expanding community benefits for hosting infrastructure.
