Smart motorway sees crashes rise 50% in five years

13/07/2020
Chris Ames

New data suggests that smart motorway schemes may become more dangerous in the long-term as extra space is taken up by increased traffic.

The only published five-year study of a smart motorway scheme found that collisions rose by a half over five years and so the scheme - on the M6 - had failed to meet its objective of reducing the impact of ‘accidents’.

In each of the last three years of the study, the number of collisions was around 50% higher than the baseline figure. Over the whole period, collisions were an average of 34% higher, a finding that the study describes as ‘statistically significant’.

It adds: 'It is therefore concluded that the increase in the number of collisions is likely to be linked to the scheme.'

The finding was left out of transport secretary Grant Shapps’ much-trumpeted ‘stocktake’ of smart motorway schemes.

The stocktake did include a finding from the M6 Junction 8-10a five-year POPE that there was an increase in the collision rate of 26%. It added: ‘This change was found to be only just statistically significant’.

The document did not state that this finding came from a five-year study.

A DfT spokesperson said: ‘This figure accounts for changes in traffic trends and more directly illustrates the risk to individual road users.’

The collision rate is calculated according to traffic levels, so that for the same number of collisions, the collision rate is lower on a busy road than a less busy one.

Based largely on existing reports, including the M6 study, the stocktake concluded that ‘in most ways, smart motorways are as safe as, or safer than, conventional motorways’.

However, it also reveals that of the nine schemes evaluated, three showed a reduction while six showed an increase in the number of people killed and seriously injured. 

Despite this, a DfT spokesman confirmed that the stocktake, rather than the evidence behind it, is now the key government policy document. He stated: ‘The stocktake, as a document, provides a sound basis for future decisions about smart motorways.’

RAC head of roads policy Nicholas Lyes told Highways: ‘Our research suggests the majority of drivers believe the removal of the hard shoulder compromises safety in the event of a breakdown.

‘Following the Government’s evidence stocktake, it is vitally important that impact assessments give Highways England the data they need to improve safety on stretches of motorways where collision risk is higher than it should be. The safety of drivers must always be paramount.’

The Five Years After Post Opening Project Evaluation (POPE) of the M6 Junction 8-10a scheme was written in 2017 but was not published by until March of this year, as part of a batch of reports released after the stocktake.

The other studies cited in the stocktake are a mixture of one-year-after POPE reports and three-year safety evaluations, including schemes that at times combine a permanent hard shoulder with ‘smart motorway’ technology, such as the one between Junctions 5 and 7 of the M25.

The M6 report stated: ‘In the five years after opening between junction 8 and 10a, taking into account a national background trend of falling collision numbers, there is an increase in [personal injury] collisions of 34%, which is statistically significant.’

Note: the scheme was completed in February 2011, not July 2009 as the table suggests

During the last three years of the study period, there were 56, 57 and 50 collisions on the area covered by the scheme, with the last figure representing a 10-month period. This compares with a ‘counterfactual’ annual average of 36.2 collisions if the scheme had not been built.

The study for the M6 Junction 8-10a scheme found traffic flow increases between 8 and 13%, concluding: ‘These results suggest that the scheme may have reassigned traffic onto the M6 in some locations.’

These findings show that collisions increased significantly faster than traffic and raise the possibility that the early gains of smart motorway schemes are diminished as extra space is taken up by drivers seeing it as a more attractive option.

The M6 near Junction 9

Highways England published a one year after POPE study of the M6 Junction 8-10a scheme in April 2014.

The annual average number of collisions was in fact 35.5 over the first 20 months

The one year report recorded a 7% increase in collisions over the first 20 months after opening. However, this calculation was incorrect: The number of collisions was roughly in line with what would have been expected based on crash trends and so no increase was seen in the first 20 months. 

However, after the first 20 months, the number of collisions rose dramatically from 35.5 a year on average to more than 57 a year on average.

The one year after report stated that a reduction in the ratio of killed and seriously injured casualties 'is a clear indication that the scheme is fulfilling its objective with regards to reducing the impact of collisions', but noted that this was based on only 20 months of data.

The five-year study also found that the scheme had a benefit-cost ratio of only 1.3, compared to a forecast of 3.58. It attributed this to both higher than forecast costs and lower than forecast benefits.

The scheme, which opened in March 2011, is a dynamic hard shoulder (DHS) scheme in which the hard shoulder temporarily becomes a running lane when the motorway is busy.

One of the actions from the stocktake’s action plan was to end the use of DHS, by converting the hard shoulder permanently into a traffic lane, supposedly because of the ‘potential to cause confusion’.

However, the target date for this change is the end of March 2025.

Latest Issue

latest magazine issue

INSIDE:

  • COP26: The sector reacts
  • Road pricing: Putting the theory into practice
View the latest issue


Highways jobs

Highways Projects Manager

Up to £38,326.08 p.a.
We are looking for an experienced, skilled and competent Highways Projects Manager to help deliver a wide range of... Broxbourne, Hertfordshire
Recruiter: Broxbourne Borough Council

Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services

circa £84,000
As Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services, you will be responsible for core ‘front-line’ place-based services, including... Bolton, Greater Manchester
Recruiter: Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council

Heads of Service

£57,636 - £58,509 pa
It’s an exciting time to join us here in West Lancs as we are looking for 3 inspirational leaders who have the energy and drive to... Lancashire
Recruiter: West Lancashire Borough Council

Senior Engineer- Highways

£23,080- £30,451
Our Highways Service is growing to reflect the increase in investment. Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Environmental Data Officer

£26,592
In this role you will collect, maintain and manage high quality energy and environmental data, and providing... Camden, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Camden London Borough Council

Senior Engineer - Highways Asset Maintenance

£39,854 to £43,741 (Pay Award Pending)
There’s never been a more exciting time to join Doncaster Council. Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recruiter: Doncaster Council

Director of Environmental & Community Services

Up to £90,096 per annum
We seek an energetic and committed Director who has the right motivations and values; someone who is... Long Eaton, Nottingham
Recruiter: Erewash Borough Council

Transport Infrastructure Commissioning Officer

£30,451 to £34,728 per annum
We have a great opportunity in Somerset to join our Highways and Transport Service. Taunton, Somerset
Recruiter: Somerset County Council

Team Manager Band 3 – Environment Strategy & Change

£46,845 - £48,849 per annum
This is the perfect time to join St Helens and become part of our exhilarating journey and help build our legacy for the future. St Helens, Merseyside
Recruiter: St. Helens Metropolitan Borough Council

Noise and Nuisance Officer

£32,301 - £35,949 per annum
To be successful in the Noise and Nuisance Team you will need a genuine commitment to... Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recruiter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Team Manager Band 3 - Fleet, Depot & Security

£46,845 - £48,849 per annum
This is the perfect time to join St Helens and become part of our exhilarating journey and help build our legacy for the future. St Helens, Merseyside
Recruiter: St. Helens Metropolitan Borough Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Asset Manager

£42,821 - £46,845 per annum
The Highway Asset Manager is responsible for the strategic management of all the council’s highway assets... Blackburn, Lancashire
Recruiter: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Digital Evidence Officer

£25.137 - £26.520
The Digital Evidence (CCTV) Team are responsible for improving community safety outcomes throughout the Royal Borough of Greenwich by... Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Guaranteed Relief Cleaners North and South Kirklees Area

£9.25 per hour
Some of the key features and benefits of being part of the Kirklees Cleaning Service include... Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Group Engineer - Safety Design

£40,876 - £45,859
We are looking for an experienced engineer to join our Highways Safety Design team. Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Highways Presents

 

Highways on Fridays

Register now!

Latest Video