Analysis: What drives an industry to take a systems approach?

20/11/2020 |

Atkins' managing director highways, Peter Baynham (pictured top), and chief engineer Ian Gibson discuss how highways can learn from the 'systems approach' commonly used in sectors like defence, aerospace, nuclear and rail.

They explore the benefits it would bring and equally importantly, what happens if we don’t do it.

What drives an industry to take a systems approach?

In highways, you could say our onus to change is our target to have zero KSIs (killed and seriously injured) on the roads by 2040, as well as net zero by 2050.

As our infrastructure becomes more intelligent and we create truly ‘digital roads’, the systems approach has the potential to transform the way we plan and manage our network.

Factor in connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) and changing customer expectations as well, and we must take a different approach if we are to stand any chance of meeting these challenging targets and reacting to a changing market.

What is systems thinking and what are the benefits?

Systems engineering is often described as systems thinking applied to engineering problems, requiring both a systemic mindset and a systematic approach.

It naturally acts as an integrating approach across multi-disciplinary teams, with the potential to enable outcomes which could not be achieved by thinking in silos.

Having both started our careers in aerospace and defence, we’ve seen first-hand how a systems approach can benefit complex engineering problems.

The only way we can prove an aircraft is safe is to prove the entire system works.

Now obviously, roads don’t fall out of the sky, but we’d argue that road safety is just as important as air safety as is efficiency, longevity and traceability. All clear benefits of a systems approach.

Efficiency: A key benefit of systems engineering is a more standardised approach to design. If we take an aircraft designer, as an example, they take a product line approach and don’t ‘build new’.

Each design is based on what has been designed previously.

This not only decreases the time needed to design, but it also allows you to produce multiple designs simultaneously and choose the one that is most appropriate at the end, with the confidence it will work, fit the overall system and provide the desired outcomes.

In a road context we’re already using standardisation in vehicle design, so why shouldn’t that same thinking be applied on the roads those vehicles drive on?

Safety: Roads are part of our critical national infrastructure, so we can expect them to come under more scrutiny, and to be asked to prove that they are safe and increasingly secure. The best way to prove any project, including roads, is safe and resilient is to show it’s been considered and implemented right the way through the engineering process – something that is at the heart of systems engineering.

Longevity: In defence, we have to keep warships going for decades; we can add new subsystems, but we keep the original structure as long as possible. You could say roads are similar – we expect them to operate, with some maintenance and additions, for centuries. The best way to ensure this kind of durability is to take a systems approach – where we understand fully how any change in the road will impact other aspects of the system.

Traceability: You rarely hear traceability mentioned in highways, but in other sectors it is a dominating force. If we think about things like CAVs coming onto our roads, traceability suddenly becomes more important to demonstrate compliance against a requirement. If a CAV crashes, where does the fault lie? Whose ‘responsibility’ is it? A systems approach ensures we can easily trace, and ‘prove’, everything we have done to keep our roads safe.

So, what drove systems thinking in other sectors?

In defence, the history of systems approaches can be traced back to the Battle of Britain. In order to defend our shores, we had to make sure all parts, and all interactions, of our air defence system – from the radio intercepts to the pilots to the men on the ground – were working together. In many ways this reflects true 'capability level' thinking where individual elements were evolved to create the desired emergent behaviour as an Air Defence system.

Similarly, nuclear submarines provide a good example of designing and integrating various systems, processes and people; specifically, to provide desired emergent properties (the ability to operate fully underwater for extended periods) and mitigate undesired emergent properties (the reactor has to operate in a safe and reliable manner).

Whereas it might be possible to take more of a trial and error approach to conventional submarine design (and indeed this is essentially how it began), it was recognised that nuclear submarines had to be developed and designed using a systems approach, creating the technology in a systematic manner while keeping sight of the overall systemic properties.

What happens if you don’t apply a systems approach?

There are obvious benefits to systems engineering, but as always, it’s right to ask the question: what if we don’t do it? Across industries, we can see examples of where a failure to address the entire system has led to huge losses in terms of time, money and customer confidence.

Smart meters in the energy industry is a prime example of how, without systems thinking, a ‘smart’ initiative can fail. When they first released smart meters, no significant attempt was made to make them interoperable, meaning that changing your supplier meant having to change your meter.

With the second generation of smart meters, the interoperability was improved, but in doing so the manufacturers added anti-tamper software which had a rather unfortunate emergent property. Following good manufacturing practice, a subset of systems in each batch went through factory testing as part of a quality assurance regime. Unfortunately, this put them into a mode where they could not be installed at a customer’s property - they thought that they were being tampered with and put themselves into security lockdown mode.

Smart meters are a vital component of the move towards smart networks, but the industry and its regulators hadn’t thoroughly considered the systems issues around integration and commissioning.

Another common example is the 737 Max, a Boeing aircraft currently grounded and losing billions of dollars. What most people don’t recognise is this is an instance where systems engineering wasn’t done properly – the aircraft was redesigned incrementally, small changes that were fine in their own right, but didn’t work once they were all done together.

A systems approach ensures that with every small change, you go back to first base to check the overall system still works.

This kind of ‘change management’ could become an issue in highways as systems become more complex.

Could systems engineering be a better way of helping us manage these incremental and ongoing changes to the road network?

Highways InProfile

latest magazine issue
Highways jobs

Senior Civil Engineer - Major Projects x 4

£45,894.00 - £54,952.00
We are looking for experienced engineers to help us progress a number of key projects and programmes Glasgow, Glasgow City
Recruiter: Transport Scotland

Technician - Maintenance

£31001.0000 - £36471.0000 per annum
Essex Highways is responsible for managing and maintaining one of the largest highway networks in the country
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Highways Contract Engineer

£46,731 - £49,764
The team helps provide a safe road network that operates efficiently and effectively.  Northamptonshire
Recruiter: North Northamptonshire Council

Principal Transport Planner

£46,731 - £49,764 (pro-rata)
We are looking for an experienced professional to join us on a six-month temporary contact as a Principal Transport Planner. Kettering, Northamptonshire
Recruiter: North Northamptonshire Council

Highways Maintenance Operative

£Competitive
We have a fantastic opportunity for a Permanent Highways Maintenance Operative Broughton, Brigg
Recruiter: Amey

Head of Highways Contracts & Network

£81,803 progressing to £90,664 per annum
The team includes approximately 60 directly employed HCC people Hertfordshire
Recruiter: Hertfordshire County Council

Principal Construction Manager

£Competitive
We are excited to offer a fantastic opportunity for a Permanent Principal Construction Manager Yorkshire and the Humber
Recruiter: Amey

Quality Technician

£Competitive
We are excited to offer a fantastic opportunity for a Permanent Quality Technician Yorkshire and the Humber
Recruiter: Amey

Senior Highway Engineer (Development Management)

£42679.0000 - £50211.0000 per annum
Senior Highway Engineer (Development Management)Permanent, Full Time£43,960 to £51,718 per annum*Location
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Project Manager (Major Projects)

£44,711 - £47,754
Are you an experienced project professional or engineer with looking to take the next step in your career? Halifax, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Senior Civil Engineer - Roads

£45,894 - £54,952
Are you an experienced engineer looking to support the Scottish Government’s national objectives. Scotland
Recruiter: Transport Scotland

Senior Civil Engineering Technician

Grade 7 £29,093 to £32,654 per annum
We are looking for a flexible individual who has the ability to meet targets and analyse and resolve complex technical problems and formulate a design Durham
Recruiter: Durham County Council

Project Team Manager

£55,147 to £60,676 per annum
We are pleased to be able to offer an opportunity for a role as Design Team Manager Norwich, Norfolk
Recruiter: Norfolk County Council

Clerk of Works

GRADE 08 (£37,938 - £41,511)
Warrington is one of the most successful towns in the country Warrington, Cheshire
Recruiter: Warrington Borough Council

Assistant Projects Engineer

GRADE 06 (£29,093 - £32,654),GRADE 07 (£33,366 - £37,035), GRADE 08 (£37,938 - £41,511)
Warrington is one of the most successful towns in the country Warrington, Cheshire
Recruiter: Warrington Borough Council

Principal Engineer - Traffic Management

£45,718 - £48,710 per annum
At Bath & North East Somerset Council we have one overriding purpose – to improve people’s lives. Bath, Somerset
Recruiter: Bath & North East Somerset Council

Vehicle Technician - Improver

£28,624 - £30,060
Transport Services is responsible for all aspects of transport and related services Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Programme Delivery Office Administrator

Grade 9 £31,344 - £33,253 per annum
At Derbyshire, we have been on a journey to transform the way we deliver highway services to make them fit for the future Derbyshire
Recruiter: Derbyshire County Council

Support Officer - Highways Asset Management Systems

£31,586 - £34,314
We are a forward-thinking organisation dedicated to maintaining and improving our highway infrastructure. Lincolnshire
Recruiter: Lincolnshire County Council

Principal Transport Planner (Strategy)

£46,731-£49,764
We are looking for an experienced professional to join North Northamptonshire Council as a Principal Transport Planner (Strategy). Sheerness House, 41 Meadow Road, Kettering moving to Haylock House, Kettering Parkway, Kettering NN15 6EY, United Kingdom
Recruiter: North Northamptonshire Council
SUBSCRIBE NOW

Latest Video

Subscribe to Highways today to ensure you keep your finger on the pulse of everything happening in the UK road network throughout the year.

SUBSCRIBE NOW