CIHT Review on improving local roads: First results revealed

13/03/2019 | DOM BROWNE

The Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation (CIHT) has received initial findings from its survey into ‘Improving Local Highways’.

President of CIHT and WSP head of profession for local government, Matthew Lugg (pictured), reported back on the online survey at the CIHT annual conference this month, before the body does further evidence gathering and working group analysis.

The CIHT is not the first voice in the sector to survey the appetite for change and find it to be considerable.

Highways magazine for instance has carried out a series of surveys that reveal a strong desire for reforms to procurement, governance and finances – all available in its back catalogue online.

The difference is that the CIHT is one of the largest independent professional bodies in the country, with an automatic seat at the table with ministers to genuinely press the case for change.

President Mr Lugg – who is something of an institution himself by now - has been pushing for reform for years. He has made no secret of the fact he feels a utilities model could be a solution to the funding crisis local highways faces, but this latest survey, which he pioneered and which has received around 150 responses across the industry, outlines a range of different options and the variety of preferences across the sector.

Mr Lugg introduced the results by stating: ‘There is no strategy for local roads whatsoever. This is an opportunity to influence that space… There will be a Spending review – it’s generally expected to be in the next three to six months – and it’s really important that we can complete this report and speak to [transport minister] Jesse Norman and do all we can to help the Department for Transport.’

While progress has been made through the Incentive Funds self-assessment process, and its push to asset management, as well as the new code of practice and its risk-based approach to maintenance, there is no doubt that the governance and the funding system is fragmented, as is the data processing, and the money is often delivered piecemeal and is nearly always insufficient.

Mr Lugg continued: ‘Clearly the big issue is about money. Some authorities are going bankrupt. This is a situation that is absolutely catastrophic in terms of the revenue money that goes towards the day to day. I have had conversations with some highway authorities that are going to statutory minimum. We can get lots of capital but if we don’t do that day to day stuff than the integrity of the asset will be affected.’

When it comes to finances the survey results were perhaps most predictable.

Funding

  • 9 out of 10 want ring fenced funding
  • 7 out of 10 support TOTEX funding (pooled capital and revenue funding)
  • 95% support certainty of funding for 5 year period
  • 8 out of 10 support a roads fund for local highways network
  • 5 out of 10 support pay as you go road finance
  • 96% want to change the way utilities pay for maintenance of the network

‘We have this for strategic road network [for Highways England] so why not local road so we can manage the asset better,’ Mr Lugg pointed out.

The research also found 96% want to change the way utilities pay for maintenance of the network. This comes after the Government consultation on reforming the street works code of practice (see pages 84-86.)

Mr Lugg pulled no punches on his support for this sentiment: ‘We all know utilities effect the integrity of the highway network. They reduce life of the road by about 30% but utilities don’t pay the true cost of the damage they create. So why shouldn’t they pay more?’

Interestingly, though also perhaps predictably the funding issue that most split the sector was support for some form of ‘pay as you go’ road finance or road user charging. Only 50% supported this often politically unpalatable solution. This is despite Amey graduate transport modeller Gergely Raccuja winning the prestigious £250,000 Wolfson Economics Prize for his road user charging plan.

Standardisation was the key ask around data.

Data

  • 9 out of 10 supported a standard approach to collecting condition data
  • 96% we should have a standard approach to calculate the backlog

The CIHT review provided an interesting breakdown of the data highway authorities currently hold.

This showed more than 70% said there was good knowledge of the condition of classified roads but less than 40% felt there was good knowledge of unclassified road condition.

Good knowledge of footway condition dropped below 30% and drainage came worst of all with just over 10% stating highway authorities had good knowledge of drainage assets.

Reorganisation

  • 7 out of 10 supported reducing the number of highway authorities
  • 27% said a voluntary reorganisation was their first choice, with a further 19% stating it was second choice
  • Around a quarter felt new authorities should be drawn up, with a 23% second preference and
  • 22% felt the utilities option was best with a 20% second preference. 

When it came to governance 7 out of 10 supported reducing the number of highway authorities, however opinion was very varied as to how best to reorganise local structures.

A list of options was given including voluntary restructure, existing highway authorities to formally joining together using platforms such as combined authorities or sub-national transport bodies, creating new highway authorities around a new structure based on some optimal size and creating new highway authorities based on utilities models.

Taking first and second preferences together, reorganisations based on existing structures including combined authorities and STBs received the most support with 24% first preference and 40% second.

Mr Lugg accepted that any such reorganisation ‘would have to be on some sort of incentivised basis – if there is more money perhaps you have to do something to get this money’.

Around 27% said a voluntary reorganisation was their first choice, with a further 19% stating it was second choice. Around a quarter felt new authorities should be drawn up, with a 23% second preference and 22% felt the utilities option was best with a 20% second preference. In short the field was fairly split.

President of the Local Government Technical Advisers Group (TAG), John Lamb, cautioned that ‘small but perfectly formed mature authorities such as Blackpool and Derby’ had been capable of best practice and so warned against chasing answers to a hypothesis rather than letting the evidence lead the way.

The CIHT has established a working group, including other key bodies from around the sector such as ADEPT, the Highways Term Maintenance Association, TAG, the NHT and the RAC Foundation.

It is now developing an evidence base to take these initial findings forward, including examples of best practice inside the UK and abroad.

Highways InProfile

latest magazine issue
Highways jobs

Highways Maintenance Manager

£49,764 - £53,817 per annum
We are looking for an experienced co-ordinator to join the team as a Highways Maintenance Manager Skipton, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire Council

Civil Enforcement Officer

£25,183 - £26,409
Are you looking for a role that allows you to earn whilst been outdoors across the district of North Yorkshire? Whitby, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire Council

Civil Enforcement Officer

£25,183 - £26,409
Are you looking for a role that allows you to earn whilst been outdoors across the district of North Yorkshire? Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire Council

Senior Street Cleansing Technician (CDC)

Grade 6, £25,175 - £25,983 (Pay award pending) + 6% AIA
We are about to embark on an ambitious programme of change in our city centre Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recruiter: City Of Doncaster Council

Highways Improvement Manager

£49,764 - £53,817 per annum
Would you like to be part of our friendly, supportive, Highways team? Scarborough, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire Council

Highways Delivery Manager

£69,123 - £72,783
This is an exciting role leading maintenance and construction delivery. Northumberland
Recruiter: Northumberland County Council

UGO Bus Driver

Up to £25081.00 per annum
UGO Bus DriverPermanent, Part TimeUp to £25,081 per annum (full time equivalent)Location
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Street Scene Workforce Support Officer

£27,711.00 - £30,559.00, Grade 6, 37 hours, Permanent
An opportunity exists in the Council’s Street Scene Services for a Street Scene Workforce Support Officer Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Wakefield Council

Highways Officer

£33,366 - £37,035 per annum
We are seeking to recruit a Highways Officer based at our Highways Office in Whitby. Whitby, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire Council

Project Engineer - Forward Programmes

Grade 11 £38,629 - £41,928 per annum (Pay Award Pending)
At Derbyshire, we have been on a journey to transform the way we deliver highway services Derbyshire
Recruiter: Derbyshire County Council

Head of Highways Operations

Salary
Somerset Council
Recruiter: Somerset Council

Team Leader LGV Driver

£27,711.00 - £30,559.00, Grade 6, 37 hours, Permanent
An exciting opportunity exists in the Council’s Street Scene Services for a Team Leader LGV Driver working from our Depot at South Kirkby. Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Wakefield Council

Head of Highways and Transportation

£86,196
North Tyneside Council is committed to delivering outstanding services to people and places across the borough. North Tyneside, Tyne and Wear
Recruiter: North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

Works Technician

£37,399 (plus unsocial hours allowance)
The Works Technician is responsible for ensuring that the London Trams civils and off-track infrastructure Croydon (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Transport for London

Highway Network Technician - WMF2090e

£27,711 - £28,624
We are looking to recruit a friendly and motivated candidate to join our Highways Maintenance Team as Highways Network Technician. Kendal, Cumbria
Recruiter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Strategic Sites Transport Planner

£47,754 - £51,802 (Plus £4000 Market Forces Supplement) (Pay award pending)
Worcestershire County Council and Wychavon District Council are seeking to appoint an ambitious transport planner. Pershore, Worcestershire
Recruiter: Wychavon District Council

Transportation Planning Officer

Band F, SCP 26-31 (£36,124 - £40,476 per annum)
Have you got a degree in Civil Engineering, Transportation Planning, Geography or Town Planning? Sandwell, West Midlands
Recruiter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

REL Skip Driver

£27,711.00 - £30,559.00, Grade 6, 37 hours, Permanent
An opportunity exists in the Council’s Street Scene Services for an REL Skip Driver working from our depot at Castleford. Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Wakefield Council

Mechanical and Electrical Engineer

£37,035- £41,511
We have an exciting opening to join our Property Team as a Mechanical & Electrical Engineer. Harrogate, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire Council

Project Chargehand (4 Posts)

Grade 9 £31,344 - £33,253 per annum (Pending Pay Award)
We are looking for Project chargehands to lead teams working on highway maintenance and construction projects. Derbyshire
Recruiter: Derbyshire County Council
SUBSCRIBE NOW

Latest Video

Subscribe to Highways today to ensure you keep your finger on the pulse of everything happening in the UK road network throughout the year.

SUBSCRIBE NOW