Comment: LTNs, women's safety and why Rupa Huq MP is wrong

22/03/2021
Sarah Berry

Active travel campaigner Sarah Berry weighs up the evidence around low traffic neighbourhoods and local crime figures, with a focus on women's safety and sense of security.

In an address to Parliament earlier this week, the Member of Parliament for Ealing Central and Acton, Rupa Huq, asked a question of her colleagues.

Ms Huq raised the issue of women’s safety on the UK’s streets, which in the light of the recent kidnap and murder of South London woman Sarah Everard, is understandably at the forefront of many minds.

But in a confusing move to many, Ms Huq didn’t reference women’s safety generally, but instead she specifically asked about the connection between safety and low traffic neighbourhoods - as well as housing developments - urging her peers to ensure that any reappraisal of LTNs across the country ensure 'consideration of women’s safety and fear of crime is mandated,' implying that the schemes somehow leave women at greater risk because of the lack of passing traffic.

Ms Huq then doubled down on this position, publishing a comment piece in the Sunday Telegraph questioning whether low traffic neighbourhoods put women at greater risk.

So what impacts do LTNs have on the safety of the women and men who live in and travel through them? This was the exact question researchers Rachel Aldred and Anna Goodman set out to answer earlier this year.

Installed in 2015, Waltham Forest’s low traffic neighbourhoods have had longer to settle in and take effect than their emergency counterparts installed across the country in response to COVID-19 last year.

By examining police data from the area from between 2012-2019, Aldred and Goodman hoped to see whether or not the introduction of filtered streets had any bearing on the safety of those who travel on them. Spoiler alert: it does. Aldred and Goodman’s study showed that the low traffic neighbourhoods in Waltham Forest saw a 10% reduction in overall crime when compared with other areas of the borough that hadn’t been filtered, with significant decreases in violence and sexual offences specifically noted.

This was enough for Aldred and Goodman to conclude that low traffic neighbourhoods likely make our streets safer.

But as anyone who has ever felt the frustration of having someone exclaim to them that 'they've got nothing to be scared of' while in a state of fear knows -- being safe and feeling safe are two very different things. And it’s not just women’s safety that Ms Huq is concerned about, but also their feeling of safety and fear of crime.

This leads to the question of what makes people feel safe in an area, regardless of what the actual level of danger might be.

The established answer to this question came from writer, journalist and urban theorist Jane Jacobs in 1961 in her seminal piece, The Death and Life of Great American Cities.

It was there that Jacobs shared her 'eyes on the street' theory, which has underpinned best-practice urban street design ever since. The eyes on the street theory argues that the more people there are on a street, the safer that street feels to the people travelling through it, as all of those eyes provide informal surveillance that contributes to an atmosphere of security. To put it briefly, if you want a street to feel safe, get people to use it.

This is why Ms Huq’s suggestion that low traffic neighbourhoods would somehow feel less safe for women caused so much confusion among those familiar with basic urban design principles - because if low traffic neighbourhoods are effective at anything, it’s getting eyes on the street.

A 2021 study in the Journal of Transport and Health showed that investment in walking and cycling infrastructure across the UK led to a 38% increase in pedestrians and a 52% increase in cyclists when compared with the corresponding levels before the infrastructure was introduced.

The streets within schemes like low traffic neighbourhoods are busier with foot and cycle traffic, creating more eyes on the street and a greater atmosphere of safety. So how is it that Ms Huq can claim that these streets will be less safe for women?

She does so off the back of an idea that it’s not pedestrians or cyclists that keep streets safe, but passing motor traffic. Given seemingly daily stories of drivers not noticing things in their path such as pedestrians, signs, and speed limits - the idea that passing traffic will notice and prevent a crime from taking place is difficult to believe.

What is clear from the research is that low traffic neighbourhoods have all the essential ingredients to both keep women safe and help them feel safe too. But, of course, this can still be undermined. One thing that is guaranteed to make women feel less safe in low traffic neighbourhoods is influential figures using their profile and platforms to spread doubt and misinformation about the schemes.

Rupa Huq did just this in the Telegraph, when she repeated refuted and unverifiable claims that taxi drivers are no longer able to drop off women who live in LTNs at their front door.

If Ms Huq is seriously concerned about ensuring perceptions don’t leave women 'feeling trapped and vulnerable,' as she mentioned in her address to parliament last week, the best thing she can do is make sure she knows the research behind low traffic neighbourhoods and that her constituents know it too.

Spreading unnecessary fear and doubt throughout the community will do nothing to help the women of the UK, who already have so much to be concerned about.

This article first appeared on Sarah Berry's Medium page here.

Sarah Berry can be found on Twitter @SarahJ_Berry

Latest Issue

latest magazine issue

INSIDE:

  • COP26: The sector reacts
  • Road pricing: Putting the theory into practice
View the latest issue


Highways jobs

Highways Projects Manager

Up to £38,326.08 p.a.
We are looking for an experienced, skilled and competent Highways Projects Manager to help deliver a wide range of... Broxbourne, Hertfordshire
Recruiter: Broxbourne Borough Council

Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services

circa £84,000
As Assistant Director of Environment and Regulatory Services, you will be responsible for core ‘front-line’ place-based services, including... Bolton, Greater Manchester
Recruiter: Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council

Heads of Service

£57,636 - £58,509 pa
It’s an exciting time to join us here in West Lancs as we are looking for 3 inspirational leaders who have the energy and drive to... Lancashire
Recruiter: West Lancashire Borough Council

Senior Engineer- Highways

£23,080- £30,451
Our Highways Service is growing to reflect the increase in investment. Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Environmental Data Officer

£26,592
In this role you will collect, maintain and manage high quality energy and environmental data, and providing... Camden, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Camden London Borough Council

Senior Engineer - Highways Asset Maintenance

£39,854 to £43,741 (Pay Award Pending)
There’s never been a more exciting time to join Doncaster Council. Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Recruiter: Doncaster Council

Director of Environmental & Community Services

Up to £90,096 per annum
We seek an energetic and committed Director who has the right motivations and values; someone who is... Long Eaton, Nottingham
Recruiter: Erewash Borough Council

Transport Infrastructure Commissioning Officer

£30,451 to £34,728 per annum
We have a great opportunity in Somerset to join our Highways and Transport Service. Taunton, Somerset
Recruiter: Somerset County Council

Team Manager Band 3 – Environment Strategy & Change

£46,845 - £48,849 per annum
This is the perfect time to join St Helens and become part of our exhilarating journey and help build our legacy for the future. St Helens, Merseyside
Recruiter: St. Helens Metropolitan Borough Council

Noise and Nuisance Officer

£32,301 - £35,949 per annum
To be successful in the Noise and Nuisance Team you will need a genuine commitment to... Kensington and Chelsea, London (Greater)
Recruiter: The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council

Team Manager Band 3 - Fleet, Depot & Security

£46,845 - £48,849 per annum
This is the perfect time to join St Helens and become part of our exhilarating journey and help build our legacy for the future. St Helens, Merseyside
Recruiter: St. Helens Metropolitan Borough Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Minibus Driver

Hourly rate
North Yorkshire County Council
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Asset Manager

£42,821 - £46,845 per annum
The Highway Asset Manager is responsible for the strategic management of all the council’s highway assets... Blackburn, Lancashire
Recruiter: Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Digital Evidence Officer

£25.137 - £26.520
The Digital Evidence (CCTV) Team are responsible for improving community safety outcomes throughout the Royal Borough of Greenwich by... Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Guaranteed Relief Cleaners North and South Kirklees Area

£9.25 per hour
Some of the key features and benefits of being part of the Kirklees Cleaning Service include... Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Group Engineer - Safety Design

£40,876 - £45,859
We are looking for an experienced engineer to join our Highways Safety Design team. Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Highways Presents

 

Highways on Fridays

Register now!

Latest Video