Limited visibility: How do we model for a net zero future?

12/07/2019

Tom van Vuren (pictured), a technical director for transport planning at Mott MacDonald, discusses climate change and transport modelling, and the need to rethink best practice

Many have commented on the impacts for transport planning of the Committee on Climate Change’s (CCC) report Net Zero – the UK’s contribution to stopping global warming. This is not surprising, given that transport is one of the chief contributors to greenhouse gas emissions – in the UK it accounts for more than a quarter of all emissions, mainly from cars and other light vehicles.

Transport planning has a role to play in reducing and removing emissions from the movement of people and goods, and the recommendations in the report’s executive summary (a substantial 25 pages) illustrate this. These recommendations focus on four transport-related interventions:

  1. a shift to more active modes of travel
  2. transition to electric cars and vans
  3. development of hydrogen-fuelled HGVs
  4. recognition of the carbon-intensity and need for action on aviation and shipping.

Prime minister Theresa May has since sought to enshrine in law a commitment to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050.

To me, it is inevitable that at least some kind, and also a significant amount, of transport modelling will be involved in identifying, which physical and policy interventions will contribute most and fastest to these issues.

A new approach to best practice

Time is of the essence and not everybody is on board. Having said that, for such modelling to be a useful tool in the quest for net zero, we need to consider some quite fundamental adjustments to current best practice.

Transport models tend to be estimated on currently displayed travel behaviour, observed now or in the recent past. These preferences displayed by current travellers are kept constant into the future. People respond to new alternatives (a cycle superhighway?), or changed conditions (increased congestion?), but their preferences as displayed in their observed behaviour remain essentially the same as now.

If the success of a net-zero policy relies on people adopting new, low-carbon behaviours, such models will underplay the effectiveness of new modes and green initiatives, ie: ‘If you keep doing what you’ve always done, you keep getting what you’ve always got.’

This is, of course, a big ask. Calibrating models using observed choices is a fundamental scientific aspect of transport modelling. We introduce objectivity and transparency, but the (implicit) assumption is that today’s behaviours remain fixed in the future. Of course, recent academic research1 [see footnote] already questions such stability in, for example, driver licence holding among younger people, and the differential change in travel by men and women.

Did you know that between 2002 and 2017 the amount of road miles travelled by women stayed roughly constant, but men travelled 14% less? Modellers are trying to incorporate such observed changes into their forecasts; but for a net-zero future we need to also allow for currently unobserved changes in preferences, without losing the transparency and objectivity the fixed behaviour assumption has afforded us. What if the currently, mainly academic, #flyingless initiative really takes off across the population?

We also need to incorporate much better active modes, such as walking and cycling, in the strategic models usually built and used to support business cases for transport investment and policy development. The necessary spatial granularity for these modes, particularly walking, means that they are often hidden in network models, and even if they appear they are simplified into generated or abstracted demand from mechanised modes.

As a result, the potential to transfer current motorised trips into future walking or cycling trips is not well represented and not easily visible. Given the increasing interest in transport and health, and the wider benefits of active transport options related, for instance to place-making and gender inclusivity, such improvements to transport modelling would tick a number of other boxes too. Car ownership is generally modelled, but not the choice of vehicle type and fuel. It’s not impossible: I came across an interesting academic article on a car technology choice model by Brand, Cluzel and Anable2 [see footnote].

Research and evidence on the take-up of low-carbon behaviours would need to feed into the specification and estimation of such models of future vehicle choice, and practical models need extending so this choice is fully reflected in transport planning.

The expectation in the CCC report of the costs of travel being lower for electric vehicles immediately raises the red flag of induced demand and here also models can inform the debate. The assumptions about future costs of car travel (electric, connected, autonomous, shared) are crucial and the literature abounds with often-conflicting numbers, but models can provide insights into the envelope of possible and plausible futures.

New ownership and use models also force us to address how travellers perceive the trade-off between up-front fixed costs and the day-to-day operational costs of cars – a currently under-researched and perhaps too simplified aspect of modelled travel behaviour.

 

Finally, the modelling of freight and logistics is generally limited to the observation of LGVs and HGVs as part of traditional traffic counts, and the application of growth factors – from national sources or higher-tier models – to the future. A fundamental shift in the propulsion of HGVs, from traditional internal combustion to hydrogen, may have wider-ranging implications for practical decisions by operators in the freight market – for example, the location of distribution facilities and the size of vehicles. Will this at last be the catalyst for developing freight models and best practice guidance that reflect the complexities of real-life logistics?

From land, to air and sea

Considering the size of the problem, the need for modelling in aviation and shipping (not my area of expertise) is not very much different from that for land-based transport. The Department for Transport’s (DfT) consultation document Aviation 2050 – The future of UK Aviation estimates a growth of throughput in terminal passengers at UK airports of more than 50% between 2017 and 2050. And the UK Port Freight Traffic 2019 Forecasts, another recent DfT publication, estimates that by 2050 the tonnage shipped through UK ports will be almost 40% higher than now.

Again, this projected data does not differ greatly to the suggested increases in road traffic: 17%-51% anticipated growth between 2015 and 2050, according to the DfT’s ‘Road Traffic Forecasts 2018’ report. The real modelling challenge in aviation and shipping is that much of the forecasting is still rooted in ‘Predict and Provide’-style thinking, and I have seen little work on models that can help estimate and provide advice on how to reduce this demand. Technology is currently the only answer in consideration.

As a transport planner myself, I think the report misses some further considerations that would affect the country’s ability to reach net zero, and where modelling can play a role in clarifying the options and implications. In particular, the opportunity that the integration of land use and transport planning offers to reduce the need to travel physically.

We have already seen, as illustrated in the results of the National Travel Survey, that the number of trips, the amount of time and the overall distance travelled has dropped in the past 10-15 years. Rather than electrifying the car fleet, planning cities and lifestyles that require less physical and certainly less motorised travel should be considered as part of the actions towards net zero. And we have models, such as land-use transport interaction models, that can calculate this.

In the quest for net zero, academic research and transport modelling practice need to get together. Much of the progress in the former has not yet filtered down into the latter. Another challenge is how to better detect and reflect external influences on travel demand. Who had foreseen the impact of internet shopping and social media on trip-making (see charts above) – a drop in shopping trips of 15%, and for visiting friends and family, a drop of 30% since 2002.

Setting an example in the UK

At least, in the UK, most decisions related to transport investment and policy are underpinned by transport modelling: by agreeing assumptions and uncertainties; by understanding the strengths and limitations of the model approaches technically; by testing scenarios that reflect technological, political, environmental and economic uncertainty.

In this situation, I think the case is even stronger than usual. Transport models must provide inputs to public engagement – in what will inevitably be a sensitive and controversial debate on climate change – by testing what-if scenarios, explaining the effects of different timings and speeds of physical and transport policy measures to support transition to a net-zero future, illustrating the distributional impacts on different parts of society of doing nothing, and of doing alternative somethings.

1 Marsden, G. et al. (2018) All Change? The future of travel demand and the implications for policy and planning, First Report of the Commission on Travel Demand, ISBN: 978-1-899650-83-5).

2 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416302130.

Highways jobs

Surface Water Engineer

Essex County Council
£30001.0 - £35350 per annum
At Essex County Council, we're passionate about helping deliver economic growth, the best starts in life and the chance to age well for people in the England, Essex, Chelmsford
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Highways Operations Manager

Swindon Borough Council
Salary up to £41,494 p.a.
In this key role, you will plan, organise, co-ordinate and control the workforce Swindon, Wiltshire
Recruiter: Swindon Borough Council

Senior Engineer (Highways Maintenance Design)

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£22,462 - £29,636
Are you looking for an opportunity to work as a Senior Engineer, whilst still being able to develop your career and have a good work-life balance? Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Highways Projects Engineer

Cambridgeshire County Council
£33,153 - £35,755
Looking for strong team players interested in working with a variety of professional and community partners across Cambridgeshire and... Cambridgeshire
Recruiter: Cambridgeshire County Council

Senior Heating Engineer

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
Up to £48,692 per annum
Looking for a Senior Heating Engineer who will work as part of one of the small professional teams. London (Greater)
Recruiter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Senior Traffic Management and Parking Engineer

North Yorkshire County Council
£34,788 to £42,683
Are your skills and experiences suited to a traffic and parking engineer position? Is project work something you enjoy doing? Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: North Yorkshire County Council

Lead Practitioner (Infrastructure)

Newark & Sherwood District Council
£33,799 to £35,934 per annum
Newark and Sherwood is looking to recruit to its newly created post of Lead Practitioner for Infrastructure. Newark, Nottinghamshire
Recruiter: Newark & Sherwood District Council

Senior Parking Manager

Brent Council
£55,638 - £58,779 p.a. inc.
As Senior Parking Manager, you will be responsible for the effective management of the Council’s Parking Services contract Brentford (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Highways Inspector

Hackney London Borough Council
£28,752 - £32,577
We are seeking an experienced Highways Inspector to join the Highways Team. Hackney, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Hackney London Borough Council

School Crossing Patrol

Brent Council
£21,591 - £22,377 p.a. inc. pro rata. (£11.50 per hour)
A school crossing patrol officer is responsible for assisting children to cross the road safely on their way to and from school. Brent, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Assistant Director - Environment

Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council
£82k per annum
Our Assistant Director – Environment will ensure clean, safe and attractive communities. Redcar, North Yorkshire
Recruiter: Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council

Traffic Engineering Team Leader

Telford & Wrekin Council
£39,782 - £42,683
This is an exciting opportunity to join Telford & Wrekin Council’s Network Management Team Telford, Shropshire
Recruiter: Telford & Wrekin Council

Street Lighting Client Officer

Enfield London Borough Council
£37,842 – £40,728
As a Street Lighting Client Officer, you will assist the Streetlighting Client Manager in managing the Council’s Street lighting Service Provider Enfield (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Enfield London Borough Council

Pest Control Officer

Brent Council
£26,745 - £28,725 p.a. inc.
Brent Council's Pest Control and Hygiene service continues to see a growing demand in its pest control services. Brentford (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

PCN Appeals Officer

Brent Council
£26,745 - £30,711 p.a. inc.
We are looking for an experienced parking professional to join the Notice Processing Team Brentford (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Citizen & Consumer Protection Team Manager - Trading Standards

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Band H, SCP 38-43 (£40,760 - £45,591 per annum) (£21.13 - £23.63 per hour)
We have an exciting opportunity to recruit to the position of Citizen & Consumer Protection Team Manager Sandwell, West Midlands
Recruiter: Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

Key Route Network Manager

Liverpool City Region
£63,753 - £71,747
An exciting new opportunity has arisen within the Integrated Transport Directorate of the LCR Combined Authority Liverpool, Merseyside
Recruiter: Liverpool City Region

Assistant Director

Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council
£92,826 - £111,231
This is an ideal opportunity for an expert waste management professional to make a real impact and to lead the service to outstanding. Fulham, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough Council

Partnership Director (Fixed Term for 2 years)

Tactran
£79,165 - £83,020
An exciting opportunity has arisen for the post of Partnership Director for the Tayside & Central Scotland Transport Partnership (Tactran). Perth, Perth and Kinross
Recruiter: Tactran

Service Director Planning, Transportation and Highways

Wakefield Council
£88,768
To lead on behalf of the Council on all planning, transportation and highways matters Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Wakefield Council

Highways on Fridays

Register now!

Latest Issue

latest magazine issue

Valuing our roads: What is a network worth?

Also inside:

Traffex review 

Diary of a flood.

Beautiful roads

Live Labs exclusive briefing 

View the latest issue

Latest Video