Q and A with Mathew Lugg: Self-assessment, self-assessed

Dominic Browne

The Department for Transport’s Incentive Fund self-assessment process came on the scene five years ago and has undergone changing fortunes and differing levels of support ever since. As it comes to the end of its first funding cycle this financial year, and looks set for reform, Dominic Browne speaks to one of its creators about a funding pot that punched above its weight but sometimes lost its balance

A top sliced cash pot is not really supposed to change a sector. It’s a politician’s gift, a press release, a civil servant’s pet project. In highways it often just shores up finance that had bled off into other services anyway. The highways self-assessment process was different.

With a relatively small amount of cash, this funding system accelerated and locked in a culture change that helped staunch the wounds of austerity.

If we had to face up to managed decline, at least it had to be managed well. The sector knew ‘worst first’ was not the way to go, but was not always as quick as it should have been in introducing highways asset management plans.

The self-assessment process took the matter out of officers' hands, then told them to stop the hand wringing and get on with it.   

From resistance to acceptance, to celebration and then to scepticism, the sector has changed its mind several times about the self-assessment concept, which emerged out of the now disbanded Highways Maintenance Efficiency Programme.

It was intended to do away with perverse incentives for poor performance and introduce a real financial incentive around asset management.

While highway authorities recoiled at first at the idea of cash strapped councils losing even more money during some of the hardest cuts to local finance ever seen, eventually hard-nosed engineers recognised that it helped them raise standards, not least in securing more cash from politicians.

Then the suspicions began to creep in. Was everyone in Band 3 really a top performing council? Weren’t some places being a bit over generous. When former director of local transport Graham Pendlebury admitted the DfT could not afford to carry out official audits of the returns it seemed the issue was out in the open. 

Highways understands some form of voluntary audit group has been in development but such are the practical barriers involved, it has remained in development.

The mixed emotions about the scheme can be summed up in two responses from senior figures in the sector.

One said: ‘Self-assessment has been really good. It has made people think about it. It’s enabled people to get the resources both people and money to actually make the asset management more efficient. The self-assessment has brought asset management on without a doubt.' 

Another said: ‘There are authorities that say they are Band 3 and can’t back it up with evidence. They are not doing the things they claim and the DfT do nothing with it. They just sign it off.’

Q and A with Matthew Lugg

Matthew Lugg OBE, is head of profession at WSP Local Government. He was on secondment at the DfT just over five years ago and helped write the questionnaire the process was based on.

How did it come about and what impact do you think the self-assessment process has had?

‘The view from HMEP was that despite all the development of all HMEP products there still many local highway authorities that had made limited progress in all the attributes that can drive efficiencies and service improvement, namely asset management, customer engagement, resilience, benchmarking and service improvement, and better procurement.

‘In discussion with DfT, HMEP felt if some of the capital maintenance funding could be incentivised to encourage local highway authorities take on board these attributes then it was more likely that this would happen.

‘I remember at the time there was a lot of opposition but if you ask any senior local authority highway managers now they are very complimentary about the difference that self-assessment has made particularly in achieving political support for better asset management.’  

Have there been any changes to the questions over the years?

No -  it has stood the test of time and it was always felt it would be unfair to move the goalposts part the way through its five-year duration.

What concerns do you have about the lack of audit for the responses?

The whole process lost a lot of credibility at an early stage when all those highway authorities that formed part of combined authorities were excluded from the incentivisation process. This included all the Manchester, Liverpool, Teesside, West Midlands and Bristol Mets probably around 30 councils many of whom were the ones that most needed to improvement.

DfT have been threatening some form of audit for a while which I offered to help them with as inevitably when large sums of Government may be lost as a consequence of not getting into a particular band the local highway authorities will try push the boundaries to protect their budgets.

Do you think the process should have been done any differently looking back?

No, I think it served its purpose as most local highway authorities have achieved Band 3 status and it now needs to be revamped. 

How do you think it should change in the future?

My advice is that before agreeing to provide any additional capital maintenance funding following the spring budget or the comprehensive spending review, DfT should require local authorities to demonstrate what outcomes they will achieve as a consequence.

So unlike the self-assessment process, which relied on evidence of systems and process this new approach will require evidence of achieving tangible outcomes to the highway infrastructure. This also may require some external stewardship.

Will there ever be a future body/new version of HMEP, do you think?

No, not as such. There are lots of proactive regional groups of local highway authorities doing valuable collaborative work it just perhaps lacks some national overview which could be through UKRLG.

Highways jobs

2 x Environmental Health Officer (Food, Health & Safety)

Dacorum Borough Council
£31,218 to £39,786 (Inclusive of London Fringe Weighting) + Car Allowance   
Seeking to appoint 2 x fully qualified Environmental Health Officer’s to work within our... Hertfordshire
Recruiter: Dacorum Borough Council

Senior Traffic Engineer

East Riding of Yorkshire Council
£32.029 - £34.788
We seek an enthusiastic and experienced traffic engineer to manage our Traffic Team. East Riding of Yorkshire
Recruiter: East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Head of Asset Management (Regeneration & Environment)

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
£55,856 - £59,773
We have a current vacancy for the role of Head of Asset Management, and we are looking for a dynamic individual to lead the service Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Recruiter: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Environmental Education Assistant

Brent Council
£22,779 - £24,030 p.a. inc. (pro-rata)
Looking for instructors who complement our enthusiastic, motivated and friendly staff team. Brent, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Structures Asset Manager

Kent County Council
£52,713 - £58,774 per annum (salary dependent on experience) 
If you have the ability to succeed in either of these roles and are able to prioritise competing demands and objectives, coupled with... Ashford, Kent
Recruiter: Kent County Council

Structures Senior Engineer

Kent County Council
Starting salary £33,082 per annum
Providing engineering support for maintenance of highway structures, liaising and working closely across KCC. Ashford, Kent
Recruiter: Kent County Council

Development Management Engineer

Warwickshire County Council
£37,849 - £39,782 per annum
The successful applicant for this post will be capable of taking the lead on work within the team associated with... Warwickshire
Recruiter: Warwickshire County Council

Permit Officer – Place

Enfield London Borough Council
£27,228 - £29,241
You will have the ability to understand and learn relevant legislation and be able to work on your own initiative but also work as part of... Enfield (London Borough), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Enfield London Borough Council

Senior Policy Planner

London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth
£32,643 – £45,704 depending on skills
Are you looking for working arrangements that enhance your work-life balance? London (Greater)
Recruiter: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and London Borough of Wandsworth

Strategic Manager Highways and Transport

Isle of Wight Council
£65,620.00 to £70,915.00
Are you are looking for an ambitious and rewarding career move to one of the best places to live and work in the country? Isle of Wight
Recruiter: Isle of Wight Council

Community Services Manager

Copeland Borough Council
Competitive Salary
Looking for an energised and enthusiastic candidate to lead and focus the service through the challenges set by the Resources and Waste Strategy. Moresby, Whitehaven
Recruiter: Copeland Borough Council

Highways Infrastructure and Maintenance Manager - Highways Network

Bridgend County Borough Council
£37,813 - £40,760 per annum
An exciting opportunity has arrived inside the Highway Asset Maintenance Team within the Communities Directorate. Bridgend (Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr)
Recruiter: Bridgend County Borough Council

Business Support Officers - Transport Team (2 Jobs)

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£19,554 - £21,166
Within the Transport Team you will be required to work flexibly in accordance with the needs of the service, which can men... Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Transportation Planning Manager

Brent Council
£55,638 - £58,779 p.a. inc.
ou will have an excellent knowledge and understanding of transport policy at both local and national level. Expertise of both people and... Wembley, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Brent Council

Commercial Contract Supervisor

Wirral Borough Council
£30,507 to £32,878
No holding back. No excuses. Just change Wirral. Wirral, Merseyside
Recruiter: Wirral Borough Council

Technical Officer – Pest Control

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£19,554 - £23,836
This job is temporary for up to 11 months from the date of appointment to cover the absence of the current post holder. Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Divisional Director Neighbourhoods & Sustainability

Glasgow City Council
£83,708 - £95,232 (LDR3a, Grade 11)
This innovative role will contribute to the Council Strategic Plan Theme of A Sustainable Low Carbon City Glasgow, Glasgow City
Recruiter: Glasgow City Council

Business Support Officer - Bereavement Services

Kirklees Metropolitan Council
£18,795 - £19,171
You will be required to work front line with customers who are ordering memorials, our customers may be... Kirklees, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Kirklees Metropolitan Council

Principal Transport Manager

Be First
Competitive Salary
As our Principal Transport Manager, you will deliver the Local Implementation Plan, ensuring the £2.4million TFL budget is used effectively London (Central), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Be First

Highway Operations Manager

Croydon London Borough Council
£43,590 - £45,585
We are seeking an enthusiastic, motivated and well organised highway operations manager Croydon (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Croydon London Borough Council

Highways on Fridays

Register now!

Latest Issue

latest magazine issue

Valuing our roads: What is a network worth?

Also inside:

Traffex review 

Diary of a flood.

Beautiful roads

Live Labs exclusive briefing 

View the latest issue

Latest Video