Significant legal finding on 'maintainable at public expense'

15/07/2019 | DOMINIC BROWNE

A successful High Court appeal in a highways claim against Wigan Council has established an important point in case law - that if a highway authority built a highway, it counts as a 'highway maintainable at public expense' regardless of when or why it was built or designated a highway.

Facts of the case - Barlow v Wigan Council

Mrs Barlow was walking on a metalled path through a public park owned by the council in Abram, Wigan.

She tripped and fell on a tree root growing through the path.

The preceding trial judge determined that it was a dangerous defect, but did not accept it was a 'highway maintainable at public expense' and so the duty to maintain under Highways Act 1980 s.36(2)(a) did not apply.

This finding was overruled on appeal. The Appeal Judge Mr Justice Waksman said: 'As it appears to be common ground that if s36 (2) (a) applies, there has been a failure to maintain it would follow that Ms Barlow must succeed on liability. The case then needs be remitted only on the question of contributory negligence and quantum.'

The law:

Under Highways Act 1980 s.36(2) (a) it states:

'The following highways... shall for the purposes of this Act be highways maintainable at the public expense—

(a) a highway constructed by a highway authority, otherwise than on behalf of some other person who is not a highway authority.'

The council argued that:

1) the path was constructed by Abram UDC (a long time ago) and while it was a highway authority, it did not construct the path wearing their highway authority 'hat' but rather its 'parks' or some other hat, and so was not performing the function of highway authority;

2) regardless of which hat it was wearing, there was no intention to dedicate it as a highway and so it cannot have been a highway constructed by a highway authority;

3) even if it was a highway constructed by a highway authority, the 1980 Act only applies to highways constructed after 1980, otherwise it is retrospective and that cannot be right.

The judge found against each of these points.

1 The wrong hat argument

It is not a defence to argue that the authority was not exercising its highway function when it constructed the highway but was using some other 'hat' - its parks function for instance.

The Judge agreed with the concept of a council being a 'single body corporate'. If it has a highway authority function, it is a highway authority constructing the highway regardless of the 'hat' that it is wearing, when it builds a highway.

Justice Waksman found: 'Any investigation into the particular 'hat' which the local authority was wearing at the time seems to me to be susceptible to uncertainty and arbitrariness insofar as the result may depend on which particular department was handling that particular matter. In my judgment, one should take the usual approach which is to identify the relevant legal entity and not attempt to look behind it.

'I (thus) remain of the view that, provided the relevant local authority at the time was, among other things, a highway authority, then that is sufficient for its construction of the way to attract the operation of s36 (2) (a). I can see no reason of language or logic for an additional "capacity" requirement.'

2 The unintended highway argument

The path was a highway as a result of the statutory presumption of dedication after 20 years uninterrupted use, and not because of a dedication by the highway authority.

The Appeal Judge found: 'There is no reason in statutory language, principle or case-law, why the Path here cannot fall under s36 (2) (a) because it only became a highway after long usage and was not constructed as such at the outset'.

's36 (2) (a) does not require any proof of intent to create (or dedicate) a highway at the time of the construction of the Path; it is enough that (a) the Path was constructed, (b) that at the relevant time (ie at the time of the accident), it had become a highway and (c) that it had been constructed by a highway authority, not now in dispute.'

Justice Waksman added that another problem with the argument was that 'if a highway authority created a relevant public way but did not dedicate it as a highway for, say, 6 months, it would fall outside of s36 (2) (a)'.

This would create a highway that was not maintainable at public expense and in respect of which no duty of care was owed, and would be an 'odd result'.

3) The retrospective application of the law argument

The judge noted that this is not 'an example of true retrospectivity where, for example, an event which has already taken place, lawful at the time, is now deemed to be unlawful'.

'The fact that the highway itself may have been constructed at an earlier stage does not amount to the imposition of a retrospective liability.'

The judge also noted that under the Highways Act 1980 'there is no express limitation within s36(2) (a) to highways created after the commencement of the Act', and 'nor is there any basis for implying such a limitation'.

Rather from 1980 highway authorities acquired a new duty, for the future only, to maintain highways constructed by highway authorities, whenever they were constructed.

Wigan Council was approached for comment.

Highways InProfile

latest magazine issue
Highways jobs

Traffic Management Officer - WMF2114e

£37,035 - £37,938
Are you an experienced and motivated professional looking to take the next step in your traffic management career? Cumbria / Various
Recruiter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Senior Transport Planner

£47,532 - £50,574
Royal Greenwich is a borough synonymous with first class modern services Greenwich, London (Greater)
Recruiter: Royal Borough of Greenwich

Technician - Highway Inspector

Grade 8 £28,797 - £30,708 per annum (Pay Award Pending)
Within the Highways Maintenance Team we are looking for an enthusiastic, customer focused and experienced person to join the Service Derbyshire
Recruiter: Derbyshire County Council

Project Delivery Senior Team Leader

£74,480 - £85,964
Are you an experienced Chartered Civil Engineer (or equivalent professional qualification) Glasgow City
Recruiter: Transport Scotland

Assistant Traffic Management Technician - WMF2104e

£25,584 - £25,992
Westmorland and Furness Council is seeking an organised and enthusiastic individual to join our South Lakeland team Kendal, Cumbria
Recruiter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Bulky Operative

£25,584.00 - £27,269.00, Grade 5, 37 hours, Permanent.
An opportunity exists in the Council’s Street Scene Services for a Bulky Operative Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Recruiter: Wakefield Council

Project Delivery Team Leader

£57,710 - £71,842
Are you an experienced Chartered Civil Engineer (or equivalent professional qualification). Glasgow City
Recruiter: Transport Scotland

Traffic Management Officer - WMF2102e

£37,035 - £37,938
This is a key role supporting the delivery a wide range of traffic and road safety schemes. Kendal, Cumbria
Recruiter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Shared Service Manager (Waste) North Herts Council

£52000 - £61000 per annum
Shared Service Manager (Waste) North Herts CouncilNorth Herts CouncilPermanent, Full Time£52,866 - £61,866 per annum, plus car allowance (pay award pe England, Hertfordshire, Letchworth Garden City
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Street Scene Protection Officer - Braintree District Council

£30000 - £34000 per annum
Street Scene Protection Officer - Braintree District CouncilBraintree District CouncilPermanent, Full Time£30,313 to £34,612 per annumLocation
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Traffic Management Officer - WMF2102e

£37,035 - £37,938
This is a key role supporting the delivery a wide range of traffic and road safety schemes. Kendal, Cumbria
Recruiter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Assistant Traffic Management Technician - WMF2104e

£25,584 - £25,992
This is a key support role, helping to deliver a wide range of traffic and road safety schemes across South Lakeland. Kendal, Cumbria
Recruiter: Westmorland and Furness Council

Flood Risk Engineering and Strategy Officer

£49,764 - £55,623
In line with our One Coventry Values, we want to ensure that our communities are represented across our workforce Coventry, West Midlands
Recruiter: Coventry City Council

Senior Integrated Transport Officer

£34,324 - £37,529
Are you an experienced transport planning professional ready to influence strategic policy and drive real change Matlock, Derbyshire
Recruiter: Derbyshire County Council

Roadworker Trainee LGV Driver (3 Posts)

Grade 6 £25,183 - £25,638 per annum (Pay award pending)
We’re looking for Roadworker/trainee LGV drivers to be part of our team undertaking major highway, bridge and related construction and reconstruction Derbyshire
Recruiter: Derbyshire County Council

Engineer

£44,430 - £51,663
This post is within the Highways Design and Delivery Team. London (Greater)
Recruiter: Tower Hamlets London Borough Council

Civil Enforcement Officer - WMF3013e

£27,711 -£28,624
Are you seeking an active and challenging role, part of a friendly and welcoming team? Cumbria / Various
Recruiter: Westmorland and Furness Council

UGO Bus Driver

Up to £25081.00 per annum
UGO Bus DriverPermanent, Part TimeUp to £25,081 per annum (full time equivalent)Location
Recruiter: Essex County Council

Head of Highways Operations

Salary
Somerset Council
Recruiter: Somerset Council

Works Technician

£37,399 (plus unsocial hours allowance)
The Works Technician is responsible for ensuring that the London Trams civils and off-track infrastructure Croydon (City/Town), London (Greater)
Recruiter: Transport for London
SUBSCRIBE NOW

Latest Video

Subscribe to Highways today to ensure you keep your finger on the pulse of everything happening in the UK road network throughout the year.

SUBSCRIBE NOW